|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Malc,
When you receive the book, I think you'll find that starting with Chpt 2
is more beneficial than starting with chpt 1, (unless you are very
familiar with Gann). I think you'll also find that the trading
techniques are for the most part Gann techniques, however Murrey does
fill in some missing blanks and explanations and adds a few of his own
twists.
The only other thing I'll add is that if you find yourself getting
confused on setting up templates, etc., please feel free to drop me a
line. I'll help if I can.
-- Gt --
Mr. Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> In-Reply-To: <970908035939_-1031610174@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Daniel.
>
> I'm surprised that you thought that my mail was trivial or, rather,
> 'silly'. It was not.
>
> I was explaining how some people get the wrong end of the stick and
> start attributing effects to causes. Which is what I believe that Mr
> Murray may have done.
>
> I do not believe, nor have I believed or have I said that I believed
> in
> such indicators such as women's bras as you suggest. Read my mail
> again. I have just said that someone has looked at some numbers found
> them to reflect in some arbitrary numbering system and makes the
> connection. I'm scientific enough to distinguish these facts. I am
> also scientific enough to want to know where these numbers come from.
>
> Having said that, there has been a correlation between the FTSE and
> the
> height of women's hemlines. Now, given that there is this old
> correlation; have I gone to say that the FTSE is driven by the
> hemlines? No. However, they may both be driven by something else.
> Fashion, whatever. This is whole point of my looking into this.
>
> Do you ever, in your plain TA, ever use Fibonacci Sequences? What are
> they if they aren't psychological? I believe that Mr Murray may have
> stumbled onto something similar and either wasn't able to express
> himself mathematically, or wasn't willing to do so.
>
> So, please, don't disregard my mail as 'silly' when it wasn't. The
> whole of the Murray Mathematics may well be a dud, I don't know but I
> am going to have it look at it and give it a fair go and I will report
> on the matter to the mailing list. Again, this is not a silly thing
> to
> say.
>
> To be fair, I don't expect it to work. But I am interested in seeing
> what he has to say and to try to make it work.
>
> This mailing list has been full of people going on about what a
> charlatan this gentleman is. I don't think that anyone has given the
> system a chance. So, on behalf of us all and, in the end in the hope
> of cutting down the noise to signal ratio I have decided to try his
> system (if it ever arrives!) and to make a fair report on it.
>
> Again, what is silly about that? Nothing, I trust.
>
> Comments, preferably non-abusive, anyone?
>
> Cheers
> Malc
>
> Malcolm Smith, Dragon Drop Limited
> http://www.dragondrop.com/financial.htm
|