|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Malc,
I'm not sure why you feel I "would know all about it" if Murrey has nothing.
If you feel you can make a profit, using the theory there is a connection
between certain passages of music, women's bras or even human body parts and
the financial markets, feel free to invest your money. I remember the ET
film had engineers making contact with extra- terrestrials using music and
lights (action). During the 20's they used astrologers to make investments.
Why, I believe they even used psychics. If you study all these things long
enough, the human mind can easily be made to believe anything.
As for myself, I think I will just stick with simple technical analysis.
While the book, Martin Pring on Market Momentum, doesn't have anything as
exotic as the above, I'll be happy just making all the money.
Daniel Martinez
Orange County, CA
P.S.: I will no longer have the time to answer silly emails such as the one
quoted below. Therefore, this is the last time I be able to answer silly
emails.
In a message dated 97-09-08 02:42:05 EDT, dragondrop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
<< Dan,
The way I see it is that (a) he has nothing, or (b) he has found a way
to map crowd psychology onto a chart. If the former then you will
certainly know all about it.
If the latter then I expect that he is mixing up cause and effect. For
example, the bit about the saxophone. Perhaps one of the reasons that
the saxophone is so pleasing to us is that it produces a 'golden' tone.
TH Murray may have discovered some of the 'golden' values and rations
for TA work (we already have Fibonacci and Gann analysis) and then has
found something else that uses or corresponds with that value.
Which is possibly the reason why his postings read somewhat odd.
As I say, he may actually have something, he may not. I haven't fallen
for the belief that I should measure the depth of my wife's ovaries
(which, of course I like to do from time to time with my own in-built
dipstick) or their height from the ground as a basis for trading. But,
since I am a believer in crowd psychology (ie I believe in the concept)
then because we find one thing pleasing and attractive doesn't mean
that we don't find the same values pleasing elsewhere.
He has also banged on somewhat about lots of things which, to be
honest, sound most distinctly odd. But, I feel that *if* he has
something then he's mistaking cause with effect.
Looking back at what he has said I couldn't help feeling that he may
actually have something. It may not work for the reasons that he
states (the music of the spheres and stuff) but for simple
psychological reasons. So, I've decided to invest in the book to
discover for once and for all what it's all about. After all, I've
seen things which were considered dafter to work in other fields, so
this is the reason why I am not disregarding outright his methodology.
Either way, you can be assured that I will be getting my money's worth.
Either in my bank account or within this mailing list.
Regards
Malc
Malcolm Smith, Dragon Drop Limited
http://www.dragondrop.com/financial.htm
>>
|