|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
At 10:05 PM 8/7/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Right
on, Clyde.
The real stoke of genius was to
give the money to the top 1% because, given trickle-down's inefficiency,
a larger cut can be justified.
Let's see, if the top few percent pay something in the neighborhood of
86% of all the income taxes and we have an across the board tax cut, who
would get the largest share of that cut? Surely not those who paid
it in the first place? And who is it that provide new jobs and
start new businesses? Is it the low income folks? Or could it
be those who have already had success in life? Well, to hell with
them, let them pay 100% of the taxes!
Bob
p.s. ... Soon, someone will call for an end to political posts to this
list and I'll agree with them even though I am contributing to the
discussion. I guess I need to get to my moderating duties beginning
with myself.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|