|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"if the top few percent pay something in the neighborhood of 86% of all the
income taxes". Of course, they don't, so none of the rest of your
statement follows.
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
BobsKC
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 1:53
PM
Subject: RE: [RT] Fwd: Bond and S&P
update - $18 crude oil
At 10:05 PM 8/7/2004 -0700, you wrote:
<FONT face=arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Right on, Clyde. <FONT face=arial color=#0000ff
size=2>The real stoke of genius was to give the money to the top 1% because,
given trickle-down's inefficiency, a larger cut can be
justified.Let's see, if the top few percent pay
something in the neighborhood of 86% of all the income taxes and we have an
across the board tax cut, who would get the largest share of that cut?
Surely not those who paid it in the first place? And who is it that
provide new jobs and start new businesses? Is it the low income
folks? Or could it be those who have already had success in life?
Well, to hell with them, let them pay 100% of the
taxes!Bobp.s. ... Soon, someone will call for an end to
political posts to this list and I'll agree with them even though I am
contributing to the discussion. I guess I need to get to my moderating
duties beginning with myself.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|