[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Forecast Review



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

RT,

  I hope no one  minds my reposting this information.  Some times much can
be learned with the benefit of hindsight. Please note that the S&P 500 cash
made its low at 1306 on October 18 and there was a retest of the lows on
October 26. Both lows coincided with a planet turning either Retrograde or
Direct.  Now in hindsight, we can see the signficance of these points.

Please see previous post and chart below.

Retrospectively,

Norman






----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 8:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher
>
>
> >
> >
> >   Maybe you are one of the few that is correct 100% of the time.  If you
> > are not one of the richest men in the US. then maybe it is just an
> illusion?
>
> NW:  No where did I say that I was one of the richest or that I was right
> 100% of the time.
> Why must this approach be 100% accurate or its invalid?  No other market
> approach is put to that standard.  Most traders would be thrilled to find
> something that offers them a marginal edge 60% of the time. I think this
> approach has the potential to signficantly exceed that expectation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Norman
>
>
>
>
> "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher
> > >
> > >  "I knew 8 years ago that  turning points could not be known ahead of
> time
> > >and I still know it.  If
> > >> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing trade"
> > >
> > >
> > >Phil,
> > >
> > >   Check your ephemeris.  Mercury turned Retrograde Oct. 18, 2000, 9:41
> AM
> > >ET, at 15-45 Scorpio which equals 225-45 degrees on the Zodiac.  3
cycles
> of
> > >360 degrees is 1080 degrees. Add 225-45 + 1080 = 1305-45 or in decimal
> form
> > >1305.75. What was the time and price of the low for the cash S&P 500 on
> > >October 18, the most recent swing low?
> > >
> > >  Still skeptical? Of course!  Say that was hindsight?  Ok, Uranus will
> turn
> > >Direct at 16deg.54min. Aquarius or 316-54 on the Zodiac on October 26,
> 2000,
> > >at 11:23 AM. Uranus rules electronics,
> > >computers, broadcasting, etc. Look for a key change in trend for the
> market
> > >led by those market sectors at that time. Primary harmonic for the S&P
> will
> > >be 1396. Other major harmonics for that time are:  Outer planet (i.e.
> > >Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) Directs and Retrogrades
usually
> > >generate a change in trend for the market within one day of the
planetary
> > >event.
> > >
> > >180 = 1216
> > >120 = 1276
> > > 90 =  1306
> > > 60 =  1336
> > > 60 =  1456
> > > 90 =  1486
> > >120 = 1516
> > >180 = 1576
> > >
> > >  Please note that the Uranus Direct is less than one degree of being a
> > >square (90 degrees) to Mercury Retrograde at 15-45 Scorpio  thereby
> > >reinforcing the harmonics generated by the previous planetary
retrograde.
> > >Let's see if there is anything to this or perhaps the past 30 years of
my
> > >research has been an "illusion" Conversely, if it looks as it has
merit,
> are
> > >you willing to follow the "yellow brick road"?
> > >
> > >
> > >Good Trading,
> > >
> > >Norman Winski
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >.
> > >What was the l
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Phil" <rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:40 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [RT] Software - Pattern Smasher
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>   Better be carefull of what you wish for.   Seems "Omega" may be
doing
> > >the
> > >> same thing.  Have a product then offer a new product and not support
> the
> > >> older product.  It seems they may even go to internet only and not
> support
> > >> the stand alone stuff in the near future?  Lets hope not.  That giant
> step
> > >> forward seems to cost the ones (little guys) who are paying for it a
> lot.
> > >> Of course the companies sell the new stuff for more money.
> > >>   Also read in an earlier post that it now looks like NP was sold as
an
> > >> illusion?  The maker of the software seems to have said that looking
> back
> > >> it was just an illusion as far as trading turning points.  I say stay
> away
> > >> from illusions.  Even if you think they work.
> > >>   I just don't like that kind of giant steps, especially if I am
paying
> > >for
> > >> those giant steps, after I paid for the baby steps in the first
place.
> I
> > >> also wouldn't be to fond of paying for something that is now being
> called
> > >> an illusion that doesn't work.
> > >>   Enough of this stuff. Not all, but most of the stuff sold is junk,
> and
> > >we
> > >> just have to live with it.  Buyer beware.  And don't expect a refund
> even
> > >> if the stuff have been shown to be an illusion.  I knew 8 years ago
> that
> > >> turning points could not be known ahead of time and I still know it.
> If
> > >> they could, some traders would almost never have a losing trade.
> > >>
> > >> At 11:06 AM 10/22/00 EDT, you wrote:
> > >> > I'm not one for posting much in a group. How every, this talk about
> > >Pattern
> > >> >Smasher, and NP. Has brought me to the point I want to say something
> > >> >concerning Mr.Ed Kasanjian.
> > >> >
> > >> > His comments about the software, has restored my faith in man kind,
> and
> > >his
> > >> >workings to gain better understanding and trying to move ahead,
> through
> > >his
> > >> >experience and knowledge base.
> > >> > I believe that, Mr. Ed Kasanjian has made a giant step forward, and
> "we"
> > >as
> > >> >traders should encourage him to move forward in his abilities for
> writing
> > >a
> > >> >better program based off of his studies and experience.
> > >> > Just wish companies like "Omega" would take a giant step forward,
> they
> > >may
> > >> >learn a thing or two.
> > >> >
> > >> >One last thing I would like to say,  I would really like to see,
> "Pattern
> > >> >Smasher"
> > >> >up graded to a windows base, using C++ or VBA Programing.
> > >> >
> > >> >Happy Trading to all.
> > >> >
> > >> >Randy Cole
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >> >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/152424/_/973068371/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx



Attachment: Description: "SPX.X&Interval=60&Ht=400&Wd=600&Display=0&Study=&Param1=&Param2=&Param3=&FontSize=10&BgColor=0.255.0&TBgColor=0.255.0"