|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I don't disagree with what you all have said. Makes one want to look
outside EL (via DLL) to code more complex ideas using less archaic
debugging tools.
On a separate but related note, do custom variable or condition names other
than Value1 or Condition1 add to the 64K code limit in TS4? The reason I
ask is that I've seen system vendors use the built-in variable names when
large code segments were involved. Is it a method to reduce code below the
64K limit, or just programmer laziness?
MT
>One of the many things I'm finding lacking with Omega's programs from
>a system development viewpoint is the utter lack of any standard tools to
>make all efforts easier; from the simpliest indicator to the most
>complicated function. The disregard for integration into standard tools,
>or the redevelopement of the same functionality, such as indent, RCS,
>cflow, cperf, lint, and many others reduces what could be an extremely
>fine tool to the equivilent of a big rock. A big rock is a great weapon
>when your opponent has the same or less. When your opponent has a
>repeating rifle, and knows how to use that rifle, then your hopes are
>dashed on the same rock.
|