|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jonathan,
Thanks for the reply.
I should have asked: do you know/have you heard of any trading system done
or capable of being modelled in TS, which brings a reliable, high return?
This is a research question - I am trying to document results which may have
been achieved with some consistency by users of Trade Station or similar
software: what kind of results can we users realistically hope for? I have
seen a few scattered posts on the subject, but no assessment of results
achieved by EL Beatles.
Has anyone systematically recorded this kind of info anywhere?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Ludwig [mailto:quantcap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 December, 2001 13:10
To: jwixson@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Asking too much ??
Jim,
I only know from my experiences. There are a few funds out there that have
excellent performance. I don't know of any that are open to new investors.
My source is from investors in those funds. I also have experience working
for one of the funds.
As far as purchased systems, I cannot comment.
Cheers,
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Wixson [mailto:jwixson@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:04 PM
To: 'Jonathan Ludwig'
Subject: RE: Asking too much ??
Jonathan
I am sure that you are right, but where do you find this out? What is your
source of trading performance?
I would also be interested in what the better performances are with TS - if
there is any way of knowing.
Has anyone compared systems?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Ludwig [mailto:quantcap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, 10 December, 2001 08:43
To: Omega-List@xxxxxxx Com
Subject: RE: Asking too much ??
I actually do know of a few people who generate those kinds of results.
Unfortunately, they have a battalion of PhD's and $3 million in R&D. Not
every rock star will become The Beatles. (the 1% example) Most will run out
of money and patience way before they see their day in the limelight. Some
just don't have the talent.
-Jon At 03:59 PM 12/6/2001 +0100, you wrote:
|