AW: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive

["Volker Knapp" <vk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am taking bets, just give me good quote :-).

vk



  ++-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
  ++Von: doug carder [mailto:dcarder1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  ++Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2002 02:12
  ++An: Omega
  ++Betreff: Re: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++
  ++
  ++Nuts
  ++
  ++   It Ain't Over Till It's Over
  ++----- Original Message -----
  ++From: "Volker Knapp" <vk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  ++To: "Michael Stewart" <michaelstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Omega"
  ++<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  ++Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:01 PM
  ++Subject: AW: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++
  ++
  ++> Michael,
  ++>
  ++> I dont understand your first two lines, maybe you could explain....
  ++(english
  ++> no good ;-))....
  ++> but I understand the one about football (your soccer). CONGRATULATION
  ++about
  ++> reaching the quarter finals -  I think 80% here dont know how
  ++difficult it
  ++> is to get there (or that the US team even got there). But I
  ++bet that we
  ++> (Germany) will beat you (US) with minimum 3 goals differents ;-).
  ++>
  ++> Regards.
  ++>
  ++> Volker Knapp
  ++> Wealth-Lab Inc.
  ++> http://www.wealth-lab.com
  ++> http://www.wealth-lab.de
  ++>
  ++>   ++-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
  ++>   ++Von: Michael Stewart [mailto:michaelstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  ++>   ++Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2002 22:03
  ++>   ++An: Omega
  ++>   ++Betreff: Re: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++is this WL 'plant' for real ? Isn't he impressive? he even learned
  ++some
  ++>   ++english over the past 4 posts, but no spelling.
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++PPS. Well done USA in the footy, thats (Soccer). Hope you beat
  ++>   ++the Krauts on
  ++>   ++Friday.
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++----- Original Message -----
  ++>   ++From: "Josep Codina" <jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  ++>   ++To: "Stefan Johansson" <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
  ++<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  ++>   ++Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:40 PM
  ++>   ++Subject: RE: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++
  ++>   ++> Hi Stefan
  ++>   ++> I do my tests only for stocks by the moment, but i'm trading
  ++>   ++futures only
  ++>   ++> and my new tests to the software for trading futures began
  ++>   ++next week, but
  ++>   ++> seeing the capabilities to programing software I believe that
  ++>   ++results will
  ++>   ++> be very good for testing and trading futrures systems
  ++>   ++especially by the
  ++>   ++> possibilities to mananging possitions and money thats
  ++its posible to
  ++>   ++> introduce in the system desings.
  ++>   ++> Josep
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> -----Mensaje original-----
  ++>   ++> De: Stefan Johansson [mailto:stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  ++>   ++> Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 12:04
  ++>   ++> Para: Josep Codina; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
  ++>   ++> Asunto: Re: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> I was supposed to try out WL a few month ago but I didn't
  ++>   ++have the time to
  ++>   ++> do that back then but I will probably have another go at it
  ++>   ++during this or
  ++>   ++> next month. I remember that someone wrote that WL was better
  ++>   ++for testing
  ++>   ++> systems on stocks than on futures, do you agree with that?
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> /Stefan Johansson
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> ----------------------------------------------------------
  ++>   ++> Stefan Johansson
  ++>   ++> President, CTA
  ++>   ++> Bors Analys AB
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> BA International Futures Fund, L.L.C.
  ++>   ++> http://www.baiff.com
  ++>   ++> stefan.johansson@xxxxxxxxx
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> ----- Original Message -----
  ++>   ++> From: "Josep Codina" <jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  ++>   ++> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  ++>   ++> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:02 PM
  ++>   ++> Subject: RV: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > -----Mensaje original-----
  ++>   ++> > De: Josep Codina [mailto:jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx]
  ++>   ++> > Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 19:01
  ++>   ++> > Para: Ernie Bonugli
  ++>   ++> > Asunto: RE: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > Hello Ernie
  ++>   ++> > Yes I'm going to change to WL. i've testing it during last
  ++>   ++month and its
  ++>   ++> > woorks well. They are very oriented to the customer
  ++and very fast
  ++to
  ++>   ++> respond
  ++>   ++> > any doubts and opened to do a new implementations to make
  ++>   ++teh software
  ++>   ++> > better.
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > I think that this software is better than TS for
  ++>   ++developemet systems.
  ++>   ++I'm
  ++>   ++> in
  ++>   ++> > europe and TS in europe have less solutions to
  ++datafeed than WL.
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > Jospe Codina
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > -----Mensaje original-----
  ++>   ++> > De: Ernie Bonugli [mailto:ebonugli@xxxxxxxx]
  ++>   ++> > Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 18:38
  ++>   ++> > Para: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
  ++>   ++> > Asunto: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > list,
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > Has anyone transitioned over to WL? Or is anyone seriously
  ++>   ++> > considering it?  Their last release(s) looks impressive on
  ++>   ++> > the surface.
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > One remaining issue on my list, is that the # of lines
  ++>   ++> > required to code an idea looks bulky to me.  I really
  ++>   ++> > haven't studied the product, but do they support user written
  ++>   ++> > functions?
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> > Regards,
  ++>   ++> > Ernie
  ++>   ++> > ebonugli@xxxxxxxx
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++> >
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++>
  ++>   ++
  ++>
  ++
  ++
  ++---
  ++