|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Nuts
It Ain't Over Till It's Over
----- Original Message -----
From: "Volker Knapp" <vk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Michael Stewart" <michaelstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Omega"
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: AW: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> Michael,
>
> I dont understand your first two lines, maybe you could explain....
(english
> no good ;-))....
> but I understand the one about football (your soccer). CONGRATULATION
about
> reaching the quarter finals - I think 80% here dont know how difficult it
> is to get there (or that the US team even got there). But I bet that we
> (Germany) will beat you (US) with minimum 3 goals differents ;-).
>
> Regards.
>
> Volker Knapp
> Wealth-Lab Inc.
> http://www.wealth-lab.com
> http://www.wealth-lab.de
>
> ++-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> ++Von: Michael Stewart [mailto:michaelstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> ++Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2002 22:03
> ++An: Omega
> ++Betreff: Re: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++
> ++
> ++is this WL 'plant' for real ? Isn't he impressive? he even learned
some
> ++english over the past 4 posts, but no spelling.
> ++
> ++PPS. Well done USA in the footy, thats (Soccer). Hope you beat
> ++the Krauts on
> ++Friday.
> ++
> ++----- Original Message -----
> ++From: "Josep Codina" <jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ++To: "Stefan Johansson" <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ++Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:40 PM
> ++Subject: RE: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++
> ++
> ++> Hi Stefan
> ++> I do my tests only for stocks by the moment, but i'm trading
> ++futures only
> ++> and my new tests to the software for trading futures began
> ++next week, but
> ++> seeing the capabilities to programing software I believe that
> ++results will
> ++> be very good for testing and trading futrures systems
> ++especially by the
> ++> possibilities to mananging possitions and money thats its posible to
> ++> introduce in the system desings.
> ++> Josep
> ++>
> ++> -----Mensaje original-----
> ++> De: Stefan Johansson [mailto:stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> ++> Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 12:04
> ++> Para: Josep Codina; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> ++> Asunto: Re: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++>
> ++>
> ++> I was supposed to try out WL a few month ago but I didn't
> ++have the time to
> ++> do that back then but I will probably have another go at it
> ++during this or
> ++> next month. I remember that someone wrote that WL was better
> ++for testing
> ++> systems on stocks than on futures, do you agree with that?
> ++>
> ++> /Stefan Johansson
> ++>
> ++> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ++> Stefan Johansson
> ++> President, CTA
> ++> Bors Analys AB
> ++>
> ++> BA International Futures Fund, L.L.C.
> ++> http://www.baiff.com
> ++> stefan.johansson@xxxxxxxxx
> ++>
> ++>
> ++> ----- Original Message -----
> ++> From: "Josep Codina" <jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ++> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ++> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:02 PM
> ++> Subject: RV: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++>
> ++>
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> > -----Mensaje original-----
> ++> > De: Josep Codina [mailto:jcodina@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> ++> > Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 19:01
> ++> > Para: Ernie Bonugli
> ++> > Asunto: RE: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> > Hello Ernie
> ++> > Yes I'm going to change to WL. i've testing it during last
> ++month and its
> ++> > woorks well. They are very oriented to the customer and very fast
to
> ++> respond
> ++> > any doubts and opened to do a new implementations to make
> ++teh software
> ++> > better.
> ++> >
> ++> > I think that this software is better than TS for
> ++developemet systems.
> ++I'm
> ++> in
> ++> > europe and TS in europe have less solutions to datafeed than WL.
> ++> >
> ++> > Jospe Codina
> ++> >
> ++> > -----Mensaje original-----
> ++> > De: Ernie Bonugli [mailto:ebonugli@xxxxxxxx]
> ++> > Enviado el: martes, 18 de junio de 2002 18:38
> ++> > Para: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> ++> > Asunto: Wealth Lab 2,Impressive
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> > list,
> ++> >
> ++> > Has anyone transitioned over to WL? Or is anyone seriously
> ++> > considering it? Their last release(s) looks impressive on
> ++> > the surface.
> ++> >
> ++> > One remaining issue on my list, is that the # of lines
> ++> > required to code an idea looks bulky to me. I really
> ++> > haven't studied the product, but do they support user written
> ++> > functions?
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> > Regards,
> ++> > Ernie
> ++> > ebonugli@xxxxxxxx
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++> >
> ++>
> ++>
> ++>
> ++>
> ++
>
---
|