|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I think computers and software got so complex that it is impossible to test
all variations. I think i remember at some time TS did not run well on
Athlon or a certain grafic card. There are to many factors... hey thinkig
about it maybe it is you grafik card.
Volker Knapp
Wealth-Lab Inc.
http://www.wealth-lab.com
http://www.wealth-lab.de
++-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
++Von: Zoran Gayer [mailto:elliottwave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Marz 2002 07:41
++An: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++Betreff: RE: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++
++
++I just find it hard to see why some of us have it, and some do not, with
++this 2000i. I am starting to believe that some of may be privileged
++while others are jinxed.
++
++A mechanical procedure like a program should be consistent for everyone.
++There are just not so many variable of loading 2000i onto a computer
++that it should cause these different problems. There must be a platform
++that it works on and some that it does not.
++
++I can't see why one person has no problem drawing a trend line in the
++heat of a strong real time move with heavy action and I bomb out on a
++fast computer even when the pace is slow.
++
++What we need to do is identify where it works.
++Maybe Trade Station was designed on a narrow platform and not thoroughly
++tested on others to eliminate bugs. Maybe we just need to identify the
++components it was designed on and maybe we all can have TS2000i running
++like a dream all on the same configuration and computer platform.
++
++Just imagine half of the discussion would disappear and we all be
++concentrating on trading, discussing trading methods and making money.
++
++
++Zoran
++
++
++
++
++-----Original Message-----
++From: Zoran Gayer [mailto:elliottwave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 3:13 PM
++To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++Subject: RE: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++
++There is such a diverse opinion on 2000i and operating on this or that
++platform and operating system.
++
++I suspect the problem is on how it is used and what is used. On a moving
++average it may have no problem at all. It will work real time with
++absolutely no problems.
++
++But if you want to adjust a trend line while real time data is flowing,
++it falls over on any OS or computer you may chose.
++
++What we need is a specific action that 2000i fails to do otherwise we
++are comparing oranges and lemons. All judgments must be based on a
++standard.
++
++Is there anybody that can draw a TRENDLINE IN REAL TIME and keep
++adjusting it without 2000i crashing? I suspect the answer is no.
++
++Zoran
++
++
++
++-----Original Message-----
++From: Simon Dawson [mailto:si@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
++Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 8:52 AM
++To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
++Subject: Re: Re[2]: Windows 2000 v's NT4.0 SP 5 for 2000i
++
++
++>[snip]
++>weird behavior, and other glitches. The people with good experiences
++>say they installed it on a fresh Win2k or sometimes even on Win98 and
++>everything is fine. The people with problems usually say they've
++>installed it on a fresh Win2k too.
++>
++>Those of you who have solid TS2k's, any idea HOW you did it? I'm
++>sure there are a lot of people who'd love to know.
++
++Well, I've reinstalled TS2k on Win2k more times than I want to remember
++over the last year, and I'd say in general, the MOST important thing is
++to keep to an absolute minimum what you install on your machine.
++
++Every added app is something else that can screw up your stability..
++particularly oddball (no offence mb) 3rd party apps; internet speeders,
++downloader tools, virus checkers, firewalls etc etc. Only install what
++you
++-really- need.
++
++Also, get the latest drivers of everything (screen, sound, network,
++etc),
++and once it's all working, do NOT muck with it.
++
++I've had machines that went from stable to unusable simply because I
++mucked about with changing screen sizes etc. Some of these 3rd party
++drivers are VERY badly written. If it works, and its stable, for your
++own
++sanity, leave it -well- alone :)
++
++Now, things are pretty good, but it took me a few goes (and lots of
++pain). I have an absolute minimum of apps, I don't touch the drivers,
++and I'm happy. Everything else goes on a different machine. It's worth
++forking out for another machine just for personal sanity..
++
++Si
++
|