|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Steve Beyond OddBall" <beyond_oddball@xxxxxxxxx> writes **nonsense**.
"Steve"
* You are obviously new to the Omega-List since you do not know Pierre and
his business (BTW, no affiliation, Pierre does not know me and I never
looked into his methods).
* You are new to this business since you seem to hang your hat on Oddball
exclusively (no Oddball criticism implied).
* You do not have a RT or delayed data feed (your post of 3/4/02) and make
elementary coding errors (your post of 3/11/02).
Frankly, odds are that we will not have the pleasure of your company as a
trader for long.
But however long it may be, let me ask that you respect others who have paid
their dues, even while you do not understand or may disagree with their
methods.
If you do not, I hope this list provides a *very limited* amount of help to
you.
In the meantime, I hope Oddball trades well for you.
>
> Safir-X 3.2 for only $100 ???
> http://fxsoft.6x.to
> click on individual button, look at 4th from bottom of
> page.
>
> No plug intended , but I know traders who have bought
> software from this guy and everything worked - no
> viruses or trojans.
>
> Data cost share ? How about a software cost share
> ?
>
> Well, I'd probably be more inclined to risk paying
> $100 for improvements to OddBall even if it was only
> like 80% of what the new improved Safir-XP can
> provide, rather than the $5,750 Pierre wants to shake
> out of traders pockets (read: GREEDWARE). Besides,
> less risk to buy Safir-X 3.2 for $100 and run OddBall
> through all possible tweaks, then backtest myself to
> see if Pierre's assertions really hold up or are just
> B.S. Of course, you'll probably see Pierre post
> (like any clever salesman) that X doesn't work near as
> well as XP, etc., etc. Obviously he has to sell XP
> because now X version is available all over the world
> from pirates for $100 (so much for pricing your
> greedware above the price of ProSuite to make it look
> more valuable, eh Pierre ?)
>
>
> Why risk $5,750 on somebody who fails to post a valid
> performance summary for like 4 years of data ? If he
> really wanted to prove his software he would extract
> the improvements from the best Safir output file, code
> some if not all of them into an .els or .ela and post
> it on the list for omega list members to back test on
> their own (which is the true spirit this list was
> founded upon - not system vendors hawking their wares
> for BIG $$$). That's they way to really get potential
> customers - not by holding back on them and giving
> excuses why you can't do it this or that (obviously
> that only makes list members more suspicious of the
> inflated claims). I'll bet $100 on the table you'll
> NEVER See such an .els file here from Pierre.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
|