[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A new improved MS = Tradestation is dead!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

TS2000i *is* dead.  If you goto the omega site - there is no mention of the
product.  FAQ's and Tech support on the site no longer exist.
They do now offer their brokerage version - but no support for the stand
alone product that I paid $2400 for.   I am upset because I do like the
product very much, and feel that continued support on a product purschased
less than 1 year ago is not unreasonable.

And for SP6..... sayonara suckers.... (me included ;(

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sivaraj.K" <siva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: A new improved MS = Tradestation is dead!


> May be I'm not in tune with the current events. What do you mean by
TS2000i
> is dead? They have stopped development and enhancements to the product? If
> this is the case do you think I should stop investing in this product?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> Siva
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Marlan" <rsm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:36 AM
> Subject: A new improved MS = Tradestation is dead!
>
>
> > Also the game has now changed!
> >
> > Since TradeStation 2000i is now dead,  Metastock could become the
> > application of choice if properly updated!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Allan Wade" <allanwade@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:20 PM
> > Subject: RE: A drastically revised and improved MS?
> >
> >
> > > There is suppose to be an all new MS. I have heard from several
sources
> > that
> > > it is still in the design/redesign phase and no coding has started. It
> was
> > > also relayed to me that now is the most opportune time to send those
> > > suggestions to Equis on what we perceive to be shortfalls of the
product
> > as
> > > well as enhancements and desired new features. I have read feedback on
> > this
> > > forum and others that people have submitted suggestions in the past
> > without
> > > success, but if MS is really being redesigned, I would think now would
> be
> > > our best chance to be heard.
> > > >From my point, if the following were corrected/enhanced, it would
make
> MS
> > > the absolute best product available:
> > >
> > > Increase the calculation precision. No one will have a reason to
> complain
> > > about equation results not being consistent.
> > >
> > > Don't take away or revise the MS formula language. ADD the capability
to
> > use
> > > some external scripting language - VB Script, Java Script, Perl - or
all
> > of
> > > these, but allow full function and control while in them, i.e., allow
> > > referencing to MS functions *and* input/output functions while in the
> > > scripting language. It would be nice if scripting code could be added
> > inline
> > > with the formula language (OK, OK, I'm also on the AmiBroker List).
This
> > > would retain the capability of any Legacy add on products and existing
> > user
> > > written systems. It would also allow those who know the formula
language
> > to
> > > continue writing code without forcing them to learn something new. The
> > > adding of an external scripting language would fill the gap for those
> who
> > > think the formula language is lacking.
> > >
> > > Multiple security back testing.
> > >
> > > Enhanced optimization - more variables, better reports, easier to  set
> up
> > > and use.
> > >
> > > Enhanced stop placement (% trailing, I believe is a highly requested
> one,
> > > etc).
> > >
> > > This one will never happen but....Directly interface with other data
> > > vendors, Quotes Plus and TC2000 specifically. MS would be a killer app
> if
> > it
> > > could take advantage of those 2 data vendors'  sector/industry
groupings
> > and
> > > their fundamental data.
> > >
> > > This is not a Metastock item per se. Enhance/redo the MS file
structure
> to
> > > allow unlimited securities in a directory/folder and increase the data
> > > points or allow unlimited data points.
> > >
> > > One caveat here. Equis should stabilize the 7.2x version correcting
all
> > > outstanding bugs. I believe that would remedy any controversy about
> > > increased system resources or required hardware upgrades to get the
new
> > > product to run. Many times Equis has came back to this list saying
they
> > are
> > > hesitant  to implement a feature or correct a perceived problem (the
> > > precision issue)  because of  PC hardware resource considerations. I
> have
> > my
> > > own opinions on this (On the vendor side is program design & code
> quality.
> > > On the user side is the reality of what the hardware and software
> > > requirements are for someone wants to be successful in trading) but
> that's
> > > not the issue.
> > > It would also make existing users feel that they don't have to pay for
> bug
> > > fixes via a forced upgrade.  The "New Metastock" could have a new a
new
> > set
> > > of resource requirements....PIII or P4, 256MB or 512MB RAM, etc with
> users
> > > understanding they have choices...the old, with a lesser set of
> > > requirements, bug free, but stabilized (no new enhancements), or the
> new,
> > > with a more robust set of requirements and a more robust feature set
> that
> > > would be enhanced.
> > >
> > > I think now is the time to resend any ideas for enhancements or
> > improvements
> > > for Metastock to Equis. I believe there is an email address for
> > suggestions,
> > > but I don't have it handy.
> > >
> > > Allan Wade
> > > Phoenix, AZ
> > > email: allanwade@xxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Herman van den Bergen
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:30 AM
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: support@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: A drastically revised and improved MS?
> > >
> > > There are rumors that a new MS version, i.e. a "really" improved one,
> will
> > > be released someday soon.
> > >
> > > What are the facts?
> > > If so, how will the product be improved?
> > >
> > > Herman.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>