|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<HTML><META content='"Trident 4.71.0544.0"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>For a number of reasons
that MR Murrey will disagree with, there is a Gann connection.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>march 21 being a
quarterly seasonal change that has more funnymental connections to market than
first frost when ever that is.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>16 because it is 1/2 of
255/8.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>While the Gann fan can be
used at any pivotal low or high. The yearly high or low is a major pivot usually
at the end of a wave 5 down, ready to start next trip up, we hope. So for those
not fully broken into TA and still using default classic indicators, start with
52 week low. </FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>Richard Estes</FONT>
<P></P>
----<BR>
<B>From: </B>Gale A. Thompson <chemtex@xxxxxxxx><BR>
<B>To: </B>Richard Estes <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx><BR>
<B>Cc: </B>metastock-list <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>
<B>Date: </B>Saturday, June 07, 1997 11:19 PM<BR>
<B>Subject: </B>Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock<BR>
<BR>
<HTML><BODY><FONT size=2>I'm sure there are..., that was the first one I put
up. 3 questions...<BR>
<BR>
1) Why March 21?<BR>
2) Why 16 day (incremental) cycles?<BR>
3) Why the 52 week low for a Gann Fan?<BR>
<BR>
Thank you for the information Richard,<BR>
<BR>
-- Gt --<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Richard Estes wrote:<BR>
><BR>
> Glad you liked it. now drop a fib retracement from the low to the<BR>
> march<BR>
> high to the right. Rember you could have done this 4 march, see the<BR>
> fib<BR>
> levels setting major support for next 3 months?<BR>
> I took a look at it there are many better matches.<BR>
> Richard Estes<BR>
><BR>
> ----<BR>
> From: Gale A. Thompson <<A
href="mailto:chemtex@xxxxxxxx";>chemtex@xxxxxxxx</A>><BR>
> To: Richard Estes <<A
href="mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx";>dick@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>
> Cc: <A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>;
Peter Lim <<A
href="mailto:kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>
> Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 10:22 PM<BR>
> Subject: Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock<BR>
><BR>
> Nice post Richard....<BR>
><BR>
> I put up EGRP in MS just for kicks and grins to try out the 16 day<BR>
> cycle<BR>
> and the Gann Fan with the 52 week low. Everyone should look at
this<BR>
> one. It was the first stock I put up... Inspirational comes
to<BR>
> mind...<BR>
><BR>
> -- Gt --<BR>
><BR>
> Richard Estes wrote:<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Suggestions:<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Using March 21 as start date set cycle lines at 16. see how close<BR>
> you<BR>
> > come to major moves on stocks and indices.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Start your Fan at 52 week low. or if you count waves at bottom of<BR>
> wave<BR>
> > 2.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > If you are a part of silicon investor site. come in at the
following<BR>
> > and start reading the 1000s of TA posts.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > <A
href="http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32";>http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32</A><BR>
> ><BR>
> > Richard Estes<BR>
> ><BR>
> > ----<BR>
> > From: Peter Lim <<A
href="mailto:kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>
> > To: <A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>
> > Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 9:17 PM<BR>
> > Subject: Murrey Maths & Metastock<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Admist the furor created by Murrey Maths, it would be revealing to<BR>
> see<BR>
> > how<BR>
> > Metastock can itself be used to analyze stocks following the
method<BR>
> of<BR>
> > Murrey. While Murrey methods seemed to suggest Gann, and if Murrey<BR>
> > Maths is<BR>
> > not an indicator by itself, perhaps it is time that someone can<BR>
> > program the<BR>
> > techniques of Murrey into one or more simple indicators or
templates<BR>
> > in<BR>
> > Metastock so that anyone interested need not revert to the tedious<BR>
> > task of<BR>
> > hand charting but rely on the powerful cahrting and analysis<BR>
> abilities<BR>
> > of<BR>
> > Metastock.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Herein lies the relevance of any stock analysis technique to<BR>
> > Metastock-<BR>
> > that it can be programmable to make things faster, convenient and<BR>
> > accurate.<BR>
> > As it is, the Murrey site with its charts looked interesting, and<BR>
> > might be<BR>
> > telling us something--if we look deeper and be more open. Murrey<BR>
> Maths<BR>
> > is a<BR>
> > process, much as other analysis tehniques and indicators are used
in<BR>
> > like<BR>
> > manner. As Metastock users, we are concerned with outcomes--our<BR>
> > trading<BR>
> > bottom line. If Murrey Maths can help improve the lot of Metastock<BR>
> > users,<BR>
> > which on face value the charts on the Murrey site seemed to
suggest,<BR>
> > perhaps more dicussion is needed in an open manner typical of
users<BR>
> of<BR>
> > this<BR>
> > list.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Just my two cents worth of opinion,<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Peter Lim<BR>
</FONT></FONT>
</BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 07 21:57:57 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com by mail1.halcyon.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/10Nov96-0444PM)
id AA32540; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 21:49:41 -0700
Received: from mail.equis.com by smtp2.nwnexus.com with SMTP id AA06671
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>); Sat, 7 Jun 1997 21:48:38 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id XAA09898; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 23:13:13 -0600
Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 23:13:13 -0600
Message-Id: <339A396A.DF727CBE@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 1997 00:47:39 -0400
From: "Gale A. Thompson" <chemtex@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: chemtex@xxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Estes <dick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: metastock-list <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <199706080437.XAA03168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-Id: <"tJrNm1.0.XQ2.ezZcp"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/2462
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-UIDL: 15c54c2e54ae81190defd42e0af7e8cb
Status: U
Thanks for the Gann lesson Richard....
-- Gt --
Richard Estes wrote:
>
> For a number of reasons that MR Murrey will disagree with, there is a
> Gann connection.
>
> march 21 being a quarterly seasonal change that has more funnymental
> connections to market than first frost when ever that is.
>
> 16 because it is 1/2 of 255/8.
>
> While the Gann fan can be used at any pivotal low or high. The yearly
> high or low is a major pivot usually at the end of a wave 5 down,
> ready to start next trip up, we hope. So for those not fully broken
> into TA and still using default classic indicators, start with 52 week
> low.
>
> Richard Estes
>
> ----
> From: Gale A. Thompson <chemtex@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Richard Estes <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: metastock-list <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 11:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock
>
> I'm sure there are..., that was the first one I put up. 3
> questions...
>
> 1) Why March 21?
> 2) Why 16 day (incremental) cycles?
> 3) Why the 52 week low for a Gann Fan?
>
> Thank you for the information Richard,
>
> -- Gt --
>
> Richard Estes wrote:
> >
> > Glad you liked it. now drop a fib retracement from the low to the
> > march
> > high to the right. Rember you could have done this 4 march, see the
> > fib
> > levels setting major support for next 3 months?
> > I took a look at it there are many better matches.
> > Richard Estes
> >
> > ----
> > From: Gale A. Thompson <chemtex@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: Richard Estes <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peter Lim <kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 10:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock
> >
> > Nice post Richard....
> >
> > I put up EGRP in MS just for kicks and grins to try out the 16 day
> > cycle
> > and the Gann Fan with the 52 week low. Everyone should look at this
> > one. It was the first stock I put up... Inspirational comes to
> > mind...
> >
> > -- Gt --
> >
> > Richard Estes wrote:
> > >
> > > Suggestions:
> > >
> > > Using March 21 as start date set cycle lines at 16. see how close
> > you
> > > come to major moves on stocks and indices.
> > >
> > > Start your Fan at 52 week low. or if you count waves at bottom of
> > wave
> > > 2.
> > >
> > > If you are a part of silicon investor site. come in at the
> following
> > > and start reading the 1000s of TA posts.
> > >
> > > http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32
> > >
> > > Richard Estes
> > >
> > > ----
> > > From: Peter Lim <kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 9:17 PM
> > > Subject: Murrey Maths & Metastock
> > >
> > > Admist the furor created by Murrey Maths, it would be revealing to
> > see
> > > how
> > > Metastock can itself be used to analyze stocks following the
> method
> > of
> > > Murrey. While Murrey methods seemed to suggest Gann, and if Murrey
> > > Maths is
> > > not an indicator by itself, perhaps it is time that someone can
> > > program the
> > > techniques of Murrey into one or more simple indicators or
> templates
> > > in
> > > Metastock so that anyone interested need not revert to the tedious
> > > task of
> > > hand charting but rely on the powerful cahrting and analysis
> > abilities
> > > of
> > > Metastock.
> > >
> > > Herein lies the relevance of any stock analysis technique to
> > > Metastock-
> > > that it can be programmable to make things faster, convenient and
> > > accurate.
> > > As it is, the Murrey site with its charts looked interesting, and
> > > might be
> > > telling us something--if we look deeper and be more open. Murrey
> > Maths
> > > is a
> > > process, much as other analysis tehniques and indicators are used
> in
> > > like
> > > manner. As Metastock users, we are concerned with outcomes--our
> > > trading
> > > bottom line. If Murrey Maths can help improve the lot of Metastock
> > > users,
> > > which on face value the charts on the Murrey site seemed to
> suggest,
> > > perhaps more dicussion is needed in an open manner typical of
> users
> > of
> > > this
> > > list.
> > >
> > > Just my two cents worth of opinion,
> > >
> > > Peter Lim
|