[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Fwd: Bond and S&P update - $18 crude oil



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




 
<IMG alt="" hspace=0 
border=0>
Income: Total.......1%............Top 
5%.........Top 10%.......Top 25%..........Top 50% 
2000: 
.............37.42%...........56.47%.............67.33%.............84.01%...............96.09 

 
The next 25% pay 3.91% of the 
total
The last 25% pay 
nothing
Most Americans don't know that the democrates 
are taking about them when they are talking about the rich.
 
 
 

<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  RB 
  
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 3:33 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [RT] Fwd: Bond and S&P 
  update - $18 crude oil
  
  Yes, it is higher than 86%.
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  >
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    >From: 
    Pete Holt 

    To: <A 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    
    Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 2:38 
    PM
    Subject: Re: [RT] Fwd: Bond and S&P 
    update - $18 crude oil
    
    "if the top few percent pay something in the neighborhood of 86% of all 
    the income taxes".  Of course, they don't, so none of the rest of your 
    statement follows.
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    >
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      >From: 
      BobsKC 
      
      To: <A 
      title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      
      Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 1:53 
      PM
      Subject: RE: [RT] Fwd: Bond and 
      S&P update - $18 crude oil
      At 10:05 PM 8/7/2004 -0700, you wrote:
      <FONT face=arial 
        color=#0000ff size=2>Right on, Clyde. <FONT 
        face=arial color=#0000ff size=2>The real stoke of genius was to give the 
        money to the top 1% because, given trickle-down's inefficiency, a larger 
        cut can be justified.Let's see, if the top few 
      percent pay something in the neighborhood of 86% of all the income taxes 
      and we have an across the board tax cut, who would get the largest share 
      of that cut?  Surely not those who paid it in the first place?  
      And who is it that provide new jobs and start new businesses?  Is it 
      the low income folks?  Or could it be those who have already had 
      success in life?  Well, to hell with them, let them pay 100% of the 
      taxes!Bobp.s. ... Soon, someone will call for an end to 
      political posts to this list and I'll agree with them even though I am 
      contributing to the discussion.  I guess I need to get to my 
      moderating duties beginning with myself. 








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.






Attachment: Description: ""