[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Layoff's continue to increase



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

>From Businessweek's current issue:

NOVEMBER 19, 2001 

BUSINESS OUTLOOK 

U.S.: The Bad News on Unemployment Will Only Get Worse  
Companies will rely on productivity, not new jobs, to make gains next 
year 

 
About this time last year, people were asking: How low will the 
unemployment rate go? Now, after shrinking to a three-decade low of 
3.9% in September, 2000, the jobless rate's half-point surge last 
month, to 5.4%, in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks is 
provoking just the opposite question: How high will it go?

The consensus view is that unemployment will peak at about 6% by 
around the middle of next year, assuming the recession is a 
relatively mild one. However, some economists are beginning to think 
a 6% peak rate might be too optimistic, even in a mild downturn. 
Worse still, once the unemployment rate peaks, it is likely to remain 
at that level for most, if not all, of 2002.

To be sure, movements in the jobless rate lag behind changes in 
economic activity and so are somewhat backward-looking. But 
unemployment news greatly affects consumer confidence and attitudes 
toward spending. A rise in the jobless rate to 6% would put nearly 1 
million more people out of work on top of the 2.2 million newly 
unemployed in just the past year. Every increase of a tenth of a 
percentage point above 6% would add about another 140,000 to the 
jobless rolls.

The Federal Reserve wants to cap that rise. On Nov. 6, the Fed went 
for a half-point cut in interest rates, instead of a quarter-point, 
citing "heightened uncertainty and a deterioration in business 
conditions both here and abroad." The Fed dropped the overnight 
federal funds rate to a 40-year low of 2% and the discount rate to 
1.5%, and its statement left the door wide open for further moves. 
However, policymakers are likely to go back to quarter-point cuts 
from now on, given that reductions this year now total a huge 4.5 
points.

MORE CUTS WILL PROBABLY BE NEEDED to turn around the economy and the 
labor markets. The Labor Dept.'s jobs data show that the unemployment 
rate has jumped nearly a full percentage point in only four months, 
and monthly payrolls plunged 415,000 in October. Private payrolls 
have been shrinking since last March (chart), indicating only part of 
the October layoffs were related to the September 11 attacks.

Other data point to a sharp deterioration in job prospects. Help-
wanted advertising in September newspapers hit an 18-year low, and 
the weekly level of new claims for jobless benefits is consistent 
with monthly payroll losses in the 200,000 to 250,000 range. Some of 
the labor-market weakness reflects the initial shock of the September 
11 events. But two months later, claims show no sign of drifting 
lower as yet.

Of course, rising jobless claims are typical in a recession, but a 
top worry in the outlook is how next year's economic performance will 
play out in the labor markets. Mild recessions usually generate 
moderate recoveries. So even though real gross domestic product is 
expected to rise next year, it may not grow fast enough to lift 
payrolls quickly.

More important, one key downside of the New Economy is that a high-
productivity economy requires strong growth in order to utilize fully 
all available labor and machines. The U.S. appears able to maintain a 
growth rate of 3% or more without worrying about rising inflation. 
That also means the U.S. must grow at least 3% just to keep the 
unemployment rate stable. And it will have to grow considerably 
quicker than that pace in order to bring the jobless rate down.

PRODUCTIVITY HAS HELD UP remarkably well in this recession. Despite 
the third-quarter drop in real GDP, output per hour last quarter rose 
at a sturdy 2.7% annual rate from the second quarter. During the past 
year, productivity has grown 1.9%, even though real GDP increased 
only 0.8% (chart). Companies responded to weaker demand by cutting 
back hours and jobs, leading to the increase in the jobless rate.

Moreover, productivity may well rise again in the fourth quarter. 
Hours worked began this quarter nearly 4% below their third-quarter 
average, measured at an annual rate of decline, about a percentage 
point faster than they fell in the third quarter. If, for example, 
real GDP contracts 2% this quarter--as many economists expect--then 
productivity would grow 2%.

By the end of this year, the economy's yearly growth rate will have 
slowed from more than 5% to less than zero, a swing of some 5.5 
percentage points. But the pace of productivity will likely have 
slipped by only half that much. In the past, an economic slowdown of 
the same magnitude would have generated a much sharper drop-off in 
productivity growth. And productivity is set to pick up as the 
economy recovers.

This strongly suggests that, although some of the late 1990s 
productivity surge was transitory, the economy is also retaining some 
of the gains. The Fed noted in its Nov. 6 rate statement that, while 
the shift in resources to enhance security after September 11 may 
restrain productivity advances for a while, "the long-term prospects 
for productivity growth and the economy remain favorable," and they 
will reassert themselves.

THE PROBLEM FOR NEXT YEAR is that businesses desperate to rebuild 
their profit margins will concentrate on lifting productivity gains 
rather than hiring new workers. The same thing happened after the 
1990-91 recession, in the so-called jobless recovery. The 
unemployment rate rose a full percentage point during the year 
following the end of the recession.

Cost-cutting efforts by businesses are starting to show up in the 
form of shorter hours, less overtime, and slower wage growth. In 
October, the workweek shrank almost a half-hour from a year earlier 
(chart). Factory overtime hit a nine-year low. Hourly pay for 
production workers barely rose from September. All those cutbacks 
mean slower income growth, a downtrend that will continue in coming 
months as the upper hand in the labor markets shifts back to 
companies and away from workers.

One plus from slack labor demand will be lower inflation next year. 
Add in cheaper energy and falling nonenergy import prices, and 2002 
could mark the first year of outright price stability since the 
1960s. That will boost household buying power and give the Fed 
considerable room to nudge interest rates even lower.

Low inflation also explains much of the recent rally in the bond 
market. Clearly, some of the favorable reaction in long-dated 
Treasuries outside of the 30-year bond was overdone, a reaction to 
the government's elimination of its 30-year offering. But this year's 
drop in long-term rates is based on the sound fundamental of falling 
inflation expectations.

Of course, increased buying power due to lower rates and inflation 
won't do consumers much good if they don't have a job or if they are 
worried about losing the one they have. This will be the first New 
Economy recession, and while productivity growth is likely to hold up 
surprisingly well, those gains may well come at a heavy cost to 
workers. 

By James C. Cooper & Kathleen Madigan

AND

ECONOMIC FALLOUT 
Return of the Payroll Scrooge

If they aren't cutting the payroll, they're definitely cutting salary 
increases. Half of all companies, from all economic sectors, are 
likely to give smaller raises to white-collar employees next year--if 
any at all, compensation consultants say.

Already, a study by Mercer Consulting finds, 19% of 340 companies 
surveyed have cut next year's raises, from 4.5% on average to 3%. 
Another 11% will postpone raises by six months; 2% will scrap raises 
altogether, with no cost-of-living increases either. And, says 
Mercer's Steven Gross, who did the study, there'll be more of this if 
the economy stays soft. "This is definitely a white-collar 
recession," he says.

It'll be worse at the top. Compensation for CEOs is likely to fall by 
a third. Consultant Frederick Cook says that's appropriate, since 
CEOs are well-paid in good times: "Now is not the time to treat execs 
better. If anything, you might freeze the execs and give 2% to the 
rest." 

By Kimberly Weisul


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
Refill any ink cartridge for less!
Includes black and color ink.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/bAmslD/MkNDAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/