[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: time to compare processors again



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Good grief, hope you are kidding. XP is yet another Microshaft nightmare.


In a message dated 6/30/01 4:29:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
rhodes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

>  You are correct.   I have always used AMD and as long as they are in
>  bussiness, will continue to use AMD.
>    As far as crashes go.   Most are cause by cheap memory or low memory.
>   Also the OS.   The new XP?  Should fix that.
>  
>   
>   At 04:01 PM 6/30/01 EDT, Sigstroker@xxxxxxx wrote:
>  >How ridiculous. Application software is written for Windows, not a cpu. 
>  >Windows is written for x86 assembler or microcode. It doesn't matter what
>  cpu 
>  >is used. The only time it matters to application software which cpu is 
used 
> 
>  >is for games that use the various 3d extensions.
>  >
>  >
>  >In a message dated 6/29/01 7:00:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
>  >jack_2231@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>  >
>  >> I am using an AMD chip and my system crashes too
>  >>  often.  The fastest TS processor you can buy is an AMD
>  >>  1.4 GHZ.  However, INTC has 90% of the market, and
>  >>  everything is designed to work with it.  AMD cpus need
>  >>  a special power supply and cooling system to be
>  >>  stable.  Engineering tolerances (voltages, temps,
>  >>  etc.) are smaller.  Even if you want to spend the time
>  >>  to get your cards working correctly, AMD systems are
>  >>  not stable enough for trading purposes IMO.  But if
>  >>  you do go with AMD, get IWILL  --- avoid ABIT
>  >>  motherboards.  Let me know if this does not answer
>  >>  your question.  
>  >>  
>  >>  Jack
>