[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: EXE code to large?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

VH filter: Check this out.....originated in TASC....improved by me. Similar
to the ADX, but I think it's lighter-weight.

Tracks nicely with the ADX with the added bonus of remaining in basically
the same range over a long period of time....usually 0.3(weak trend) ->
1.3(strong trend).
Actually, it's not a bad turning point detector either.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Fritz [mailto:fritz@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 12:30 PM
> To: VBatla@xxxxxxx
> Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: EXE code to large?
>
>
> > I'm trying to add the ADX to a system.  I'm entering:
> > value1 = ADX(14);
> > When I do this and verify I get:  "EXE code to large and Variables
> > and arrays cannot be passed to function lowest" messages.
> > Any ideas on how to resolve this?
>
> Don't use ADX.  :-\
>
> Seriously, ADX is a huge function.  Or, rather, it calls several huge
> functions (DMIplus, DMIminus, etc)  It adds a LOT to your executable
> size.
>
> You were apparently fairly close to the limit before.  ADX has pushed
> you over -- maybe way over.  You could try commenting out chunks of
> code to get an idea for how much you'd have to trim to get around the
> problem.  If it's a system, can you move some of the logic into an
> IncludeSystem?  Functions add to your executable size, but
> IncludeSystems don't.
>
> Gary
>



Attachment Converted: "f:\eudora\attach\VHF.ELA"