|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Well, the markets like Greenspan's comments
don't they! He's playing it like a real pro! With Quarterly funding coming up
over the next couple of weeks he's lit the blue touch paper. Should enable the
Fed to issue with a low coupon, shouldn't it? Watch the levels on the Nov 2027
Treasuries; 106 10/32 = 25% up from the July 1996 low at 85: 113 10/32nds =
+33.33% </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I don't know how you can wait till 2002 to find out if you
called the market right. A bit like watching paint dry.<g> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My trading is also geared towards income. i.e. How much cash I
can extract from the market each day, week, month. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>One of the best features of SuperCharts is its ability for
intraday charts. This, and real time prices of the internet, is all I need. Let
profits run and cut losses short!! You should try it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Richard</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Richard Parsons <<A
href="mailto:richard.p.parsons@xxxxxxxxxx";>richard.p.parsons@xxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Cc:
</B>omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <<A
href="mailto:omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx";>omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>29 January 1998 00:33<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Bond
investing<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>That's not an easy question - because it's
partially a function of my views on interest rates - and partially a
function of the current state of my portfolio. In general though - if
I think we're at or near the end of a rising trend in interest rates - and I
find the rates attractive - I'll lock in those rates with very long term
bonds. If I'm sitting on a pile of cash - and money market rates are
unattractive compared to 3-5 years bonds - and interest rates are generally
unattractive - I might try to pick up some extra yield by going out 2-5
years. Since the "great calls" of 1992-93 in the corporate
and muni markets - I've tried best I can to stay out of the latter
situation. Mostly successfully. Call me in 2000-2002 (when I
have a lot of calls coming up) - and I'll let you know how I'm doing
<g>.
<P>FWIW - this is an income oriented portfolio. I also trade zero
coupon bonds - and that's mostly an "all or none" proposition
(either I'm in the market in long term zeros - or I'm out of the
market). Robyn
<P>Richard Parsons wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE> <FONT size=-1>Robyn, How do you decide
between 5 and 30 year bonds?</FONT>
<P><FONT size=-1>I think the Federal Reserve have to make the same sort
of decision at the</FONT> <BR><FONT size=-1>quarterly refunding. Will
you be influenced by what the Fed do next month?</FONT>
<P><FONT size=-1>sincerely,
Richard</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Jan 29 10:52:55 1998
X-Persona: <Neal-Halcyon>
Received: from smtp3.nwnexus.com (smtp3.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.41])
by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09542
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:38:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.eskimo.com (smartlst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [204.122.16.49])
by smtp3.nwnexus.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA11502
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smartlst@xxxxxxxxx)
by mx2.eskimo.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22915;
Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <34D0CBBF.7A591FDB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:34:39 -0700
From: "Allan L. Kaminsky" <allank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: C Lober <cwlo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Class Action Filed Against Omega Research
References: <001401bd2cda$54b23620$0cc19ed0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"x4s5L3.0.nb5.dmCqq"@mx2>
Resent-From: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/13683
X-Loop: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Status: O
It goes with the territory with being a public company. Investor
relations and SEC compliance requirements demand ongoing attention. One
(of many) good reason why small companies should stay private.
Allan
_______________________________________________
C Lober wrote:
>
> Regardless of the merits of the case, the worry I have is that it will
> require Omega to devote precious resources to defending themselves, rather
> than on product development, etc..
>
> Does anyone else have this concern, or is it just a small matter?
>
> Chris Lober
|