[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad INTC opening tick



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 98-01-07 09:17:36 EST, you write:

<< In a discussion I had with an Omega tech support person a few months ago,
 he explained the source of their tick data is also BMI. Therefore, if BMI
 errored in sending a horribly inaccurate tick early in the trading day
 for a stock, then the Omega  OMZ files are similarly corrupted. They say
 they have NO OTHER source for this tick data as they only receive data
 from BMI. It seems that in this case, the original error lies in BMI
 transmission.

David Chan
  >>

Unfortunately, this is only half correct. What the guy at Omega did not 
tell you was that the second part of the problem is caused by the way 
TS stores the tick data which is based on the net change relative to the 
first tick. If the first tick is off, TS will allter the value of all
subsequents 
ticks during the whole session. This method was apparently chosen to 
save space on the HD but it leads to messed up -- and unusable -- data 
if the first tick happens to be a bad one. 

Changing the initial bad tick will not correct the mess. It will only restore 
the next 59 ticks. To correct the data for the full day one has to go 
manually through the whole file and replace the altered value of the first 
tick in each group of sixty ticks with a correct value -- a painfully slow 
process that only someone who had to correct a 18,860 tick file can 
appreciate. 

>From the comments made on this list it is clear that those who seem to 
take pleasure from making light of of this problem are those who never 
had to go through such process. But that should not stop those of us 
who are affected by this defficiency to demand from Omega to simple 
utility program that would convert the remaining data once the initial 
tick is corrected.

IU