|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Bill, it's unfortunate that the nature of user groups means that the
more useful topics get buried or go unnoticed.
Roy's latest MetaStock Trade Equity indicators and explorations are
here:
http://users.bigpond.com/prominex/pegasus.htm#roy
jose '-)
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "billtrudeau" <billtrudeau@xxxx
> wrote:
> Jose,
>
> I have tried the fix for the B-indicator, replace last line, and
have
> not yet obtained the results sought. I will continue to work on
> it but am interested in your reference to Roy's TE indicators. To
> what do you allude?
>
> Thanks, Bill
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jose" <josesilva22@xxxx>
> wrote:
> > I know of nothing that comes close to TradeSim for backtesting
> > purposes.
> >
> > Forget MetaStock's useless system tester.
> > Roy's amazingly useful TE indicators and explorations are bug-less
> and
> > accurate, but they can't replace TradeSim.
> >
> > And from the little I know about AB's backtesting facilities, it
> > doesn't come close to real-life trade backtesting.
> >
> > As much as Equis continues to ignore TradeSim (figure out way!),
> > TradeSim continues to be the most useful, complete backtesting
> > platform around. Spend the US$130, and save yourself a lot of
> grief..
> > .
> >
> > jose '-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "davelansing2004"
> <d.ankrapp@xx
> > ..> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I recently clicked onto the Amibroker site and was impressed
with
> > the
> > > software AmiBroker 4.5, especially the back-testing
capabilities.
> > The
> > > price of the software is extremely inexpensive (approx. $130 USD
> for
> > > the EOD version) and seems to be "equal" in capabilities to
> > Metastock
> > > 8.01 (I own the EOD version of MS). Has anybody used Amibroker,
> > > especially its backtesting capabilities?
> > >
> > > My real concern is all of the negative comments I've read from
the
> > > various Metastock discussion forums regarding Metastock's
*flawed*
> > > backtesting capabilities. Has anybody used TradeSim? Is buying
the
> > > standard version of TradeSim (approx. $150 USD) the answer to
> > > obtaining a reliable backtesting program for Metastock? Or would
> > > I be better off buying AmiBroker? In no way am I bashing
> MetaStock.
> > > I've owned the program for about 3 months and am very
comfortable
> in
> > > writing my own code and simple explorations. But now I'm at the
> > stage
> > > of wanting to vigorously backtest many of my ideas ... I just
> want
> > to
> > > have a reliable program to backtest my ideas for trading
Fidelity
> > > Select Mutual Funds.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the long-winded post.
> > >
> > > As always, thank you in advance for your comments.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > > Lansing, MI
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|