PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Let me suggest two reasons, Henry.
My trading group may have a superior sense of humor :-)
Ton's jingoish disparaging of Elliot and Fibonacci evoked differing
reactions -- some thought it humorous and others pathetic.
Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Henry Amand
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:39 AM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock
>
>
> Bob,
>
> can you please specify why we should see the coments of Mr. Maas
> on Advanced Get as a joke ?
>
> Greetings
>
> Henry
>
>
> > From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
>
> > I forwarded your unbiased recommendation to my trading
> > group, Ton.
> >
> > They especially appreciate jokes on down days.
> >
> > Your admirer,
> > Bob
> >
> > > On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> > > >
> > > Please let me take a shot at unraffling this Get-myth.
> > > MicroSoft(MS) doesn't market or creates any TA or EWAVE
> > > software(sw).
> > > MetaStocK(MSK) also doesn't make or includes any EWAVE
> > > counts or sw.
> > >
> > > I would like to see examples where this $2000+ sw package
> > > did give you
> > > the exact EWAVE counts? Eg TRUE examples.
> > > Get is known to make attempts at it, but the sw package
> > > fails hopelessly in delivering.
> > > Not surprisingly, since its counts are not true Elliot
> > > counts but counts based on a mix
> > > that includes Elliot wave counts now based on the
> > > Fibionancy-myth, a myth that here
> > > on the List also has been unraffled before.
> >
> > > The option to plot the MACD in Histogram style is included
> > > in your MSK software.
> > > (<right click> the MACD for Properties and <click> the
> > > wavy Bars option).
> > > You're also enabled in MetaStocK to create any custom
> > > version of the MACD or any
> > > other indicator. Am sure it is one of the many MACD
> > > versions that have been
> > > posted to the List before.
> >
> > > Can you give some TRUE examples where this $2000+ sw
> > > package did give you
> > > the exact "next LOW's" ? Eg valid examples and/with
> > > examples showing that Eclipse.
> > > Get is known to only forcast "way-off" LOW's.
> >
> > > $2000+ for a simple sw package is a rip-off, for a
> > > non-delivering sw package its
> > > is plain rip-off and not the time worth spend on it.
> > > A quick calculation:
> > > one(1) complete single PC + OS sw + MSK sw installed costs
> > > less then $2000 and
> > > on the contrairy, DOES DELIVER on expectations.
>
>
> > > > Hi Gene. Please let me take a shot at your question. MS
> > > > does not offer any form of Elliott wave counts. GET does.
> > > > GET offers a unique form of the MACD, in histogram form. GET
> > > > helps locate the next LOW if your peaking in price. called
> > > > an ellipse indicator I believe.
> > > > Other goodies, but I don't own it. $2,000 is alot for a
> > > > piece of software. But, if someone wants to buy me one, I'd
> > > > be very pleased. My opinion.
>
> > > > > Gene Ricci wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I see a lot of MS owners using Advanced Get as well. I
> > > > > would appreciate if someone could enlighten me as to why one
> > > > > would use both. Thanks,Gene
>
>
>
|