[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Bob,

can you please specify why we should see the coments of Mr. Maas
on Advanced Get as a joke ? 

Greetings

Henry


> From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>

> I forwarded your unbiased recommendation to my trading
> group, Ton.
> 
> They especially appreciate jokes on down days.
> 
> Your admirer,
> Bob
> 
> > On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> > > 
> >   Please let me take a shot at unraffling this Get-myth.
> >   MicroSoft(MS) doesn't market or creates any TA or EWAVE
> > software(sw).
> >   MetaStocK(MSK) also doesn't make or includes any EWAVE
> > counts or sw.
> > 
> >   I would like to see examples where this $2000+ sw package
> > did give you
> >   the exact EWAVE counts? Eg TRUE examples.
> >   Get is known to make attempts at it, but the sw package
> > fails hopelessly in delivering.
> >   Not surprisingly, since its counts are not true Elliot
> > counts but counts based on a mix
> >   that includes Elliot wave counts now based on the
> > Fibionancy-myth, a myth that here
> >  on the List also has been unraffled before.
> 
> >   The option to plot the MACD in Histogram style is included
> > in your MSK software.
> >   (<right click> the MACD for Properties and <click> the
> > wavy Bars option).
> >   You're also enabled in MetaStocK to create any custom
> > version of the MACD or any
> >   other indicator. Am sure it is one of the many MACD
> > versions that have been
> >   posted to the List before.
> 
> >   Can you give some TRUE examples where this $2000+ sw
> > package did give you
> >   the exact "next LOW's" ? Eg valid examples and/with
> > examples showing that Eclipse.
> >   Get is known to only forcast "way-off" LOW's.
> 
> >   $2000+ for a simple sw package is a rip-off, for a
> > non-delivering sw package its
> >   is plain rip-off and not the time worth spend on it.
> >   A quick calculation:
> >   one(1) complete single PC + OS sw + MSK sw installed costs
> > less then $2000 and
> >   on the contrairy, DOES DELIVER on expectations.


> > >     Hi Gene. Please let me take a shot at your question.  MS
> > > does not offer any form of Elliott wave counts.  GET does.
> > > GET offers a unique form of the MACD, in histogram form. GET
> > > helps locate the next LOW if your peaking in price. called
> > > an ellipse indicator I believe.
> > >     Other goodies, but I don't own it.  $2,000 is alot for a
> > > piece of software. But,  if someone wants to buy me one, I'd
> > > be very pleased. My opinion.

> > > >     Gene Ricci wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >       I see a lot of MS owners using Advanced Get as well. I
> > > > would appreciate if someone could enlighten me as to why one
> > > > would use both. Thanks,Gene