|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
MOOSE Approach? Mein Gott! What's that? Looked at the
website but didn't see any antlers? Will you be posting the new MOOSE
signals, or just driving the greedy, anal-retentive members of the group
out of their minds with hints?
<p>Philip
<p>P.S. How's the test prep going?
<p>Steve Karnish wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><style></style>
<font face="Arial"><font size=-1>List,</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Here's
a "freebie". I know it's not the my deeply guarded secrets about
"Cybercast" and my new and improved "MOOSE" approach, but hey, it's free
and simple. This is the "loss leader". All those that profit
"wildly" from this approach are obligated to buy "mondo expensivo" proprietary
systems that I will market in 2000. Yes, Mark Brown, I have nasty
motives behind my posts. First you give your work away for a couple of
years and then you "screw" everyone by "forcing" them to buy your software.
But before I put the "screws" to everyone. I challenge the list to
post a credible system that has a better return than the attached approach.
I'm all "eyes". Many are quick to ridicule, few actually disclose
any formulae or approaches. The BB Histogram that I use has slightly
different numbers substituted in the formula than the "off the shelf" one
that I present. This shouldn't affect the profits.</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>BB
Histogram:</font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>((C+2*Std(C,20)-Mov(C,20,S))/(4*(Std(C,20)))*100)</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Sell
the opening days after the BB Histogram penetrates 100 and buy when it
penetrates zero. Add to positions when the BB Histo leaves "above
100" or "below zero" and then "repenetrates" the trigger levels (see attached
charts).</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>I believe
this approach has recorded 11 straight S&P winners, with 700+ points.
"But Steve, this system must not be working any more because it is losing
the last trade you put on". Right!</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>My
only disclaimer is that I guarantee that I will sell software, charting
services and anything else that I can think of to make a "buck" in 2000.
In the meantime, suck all the free stuff from me you can copy. And
most of all, please note, the biggest antagonists on the list provide absolutely
"zero" when it comes to helping you trade. Seek the answers from
"within" (with some shortcutting help from people that are willing to share).</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Steve
Karnish</font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Cedar Creek Trading</font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>http://www.abbracadabra.com/cybercast/</font></font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Dec 13 15:47:02 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27467
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:16:04 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA10948
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 03:42:55 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA10945
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 03:42:52 -0700
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07355
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:20:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: from 216-164-129-219.s473.tnt1.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com ([216.164.129.219] helo=default)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #3)
id 11xam9-0006Pv-00
for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:04:50 -0500
Message-ID: <00e901bf459c$ecb590c0$db81a4d8@xxxxxxx>
From: "Mark Thompson" <mst1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <0.d809fa95.25843b03@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: winning systems for losers
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:04:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
What are the titles of these two books. I havn't read them yet.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: <Arsk0jn@xxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Arsk0jn@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: winning systems for losers
> In a message dated 12/11/1999 6:11:18 PM Central Daylight Time,
> lissen@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Joe Granville >>
> I remember that statement, Lionel, as I was a fan of Joe Granville back in
> those days. His comment was: Half of the people that bought it (his book)
> wouldn't read it; of the half that read it, half wouldn't understand it;
of
> that half that understood it, most wouldn't apply the information
correctly;
> of the few that did, most already knew most of what he said; the few
> remaining wouldn't make any difference.
> I still have that book and you're right, it's the best of the books that
he
> wrote. In later years, he got away from what he wrote in that book and
that's
> when he started getting into trouble. I think his second book on OBV was
his
> next best. Both rank in the top ten of the almost 160 books I've read over
> the years.
> Good trading,
> Joe Nemecek
>
|