|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>Was your data for day session only or 24 hour(midnight to midnight)?
10-4
>This is what I get for 24 hour midnight to midnight via the DTN velocity
>satelite 230K with 100% clear skies.
I-net was clear with a full moon on Wed ;-)
>ESU2 fed by ByteRunner PCI-100H into a dual 600mhz cpu.
Same symbol fed by DS for Esignal/TS4 into a single 933mhz cpu with 0.64
gig mem, 56K i-net dialup, 3com Lanmodem.
> I recently replaced
>the PacCommware TE920 with the ByteRunner with faster UART and larger byte
>buffer. Charting seems to run noticeably better at the open after replacing
>the serial port. Some traders experience a pause in TS charting right at
>the open+ a little. Could be my imagination, but it seems like the
>ByteRunner has reduced the opening bottleneck. The ByteRunner is a PCI card
>and the TE920 is an ISA plus they have different drivers. Would be
>interesting to compare these numbers with someone running on the ethernet
>port via the dynastore-dtn and with someone running at the 400K speed.
Jimo, how's it going with TS4 and DS-DTN sat?
bobr's T's
>Mon 140353 140042
>Tues 145456 145209
>Wed 152097 151598
>Thu 135210 136545
>Fri 96993 97191
>
>bobr
T
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "jdfo" <jdo1@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Omega List" <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 6:00 AM
>Subject: Tick Reliability
>
>
> > I use a cable modem, TradeStation 2000i and e-signal. This past week, I
> > received the following ticks on the E-mini, Sept contract:
> >
> > Mon 7/22 139,304
> > Tue 7/23 141,241
> > Wed 7/24 149,970
> > Thu 7/25 136,459
> > Fri 7/26 91,308
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone would care to compare their results to
> > determine the reliability of cable modems and e-signal?
> > I know that retrieving this same data from Omega's HistoryBank.com
> > results in an 40 to 50% error rate; HistoryBank loses almost one-half of
> > the ticks, making this resource totally useless.
> > Thanks in advance for any replies.
> >
> > John O
> >
> >
> >
> >
|