[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Work 50-70 hours a week



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello list,

Sorry, but I just couldn't pass this one up. Every single trader that I 
have ever known that is worth a damn works at least those many hours. The 
vast majority of these traders (myself included) are not mechanical but 
discretionary traders. Sure some of them might use some mechanical models 
but for the most part they are discretionary. This means they must know a 
certain amount (and often a lot) of fundamental's. This means they must 
read, and think - this takes a lot of time. Reading the WSJ, Financial 
Times, NY Times, and the headlines of the overseas newspapers on the 
Internet every morning - before the NY markets open,  then reviewing your 
trading diary every afternoon (don't tell me that you don't keep a trading 
journal) takes time. Reading the news articles that the news clipping 
services send you every day takes a lot of time. Then on the weekends 
reading Barrons, various magazines, and various think tank journals takes 
time.

What takes the most time through is taking the time to put all of the 
pieces together inside you own unique mental perspective so that you can 
profit from this information. The big money is made in the big moves, and 
big moves typically don't happen out of the blue. Likewise, big money is 
unable to enter a market without leaving clues - our job is to determine 
what those clues are and why.

The other day a trader asked for info on a web site that would provide 
historical financial information on a certain date. To my knowledge this 
doesn't exist. As another trader observed that the market moves THEN the 
reporters then attempt to explain why - this is true. However, before the 
big move there are often plenty of signals/news/clues/info that would 
indicate that a big move was being "set up" by the big money. The saying 
that "hindsight is 20-20" is very true, and it is true because after a big 
move then even the idiots can figure out what the clues were. The trick is 
figuring out what these clues are before the big move.

This means that you must be willing to read, and you must be willing to 
read news that stretches your mental perspectives. By stretching your 
beliefs about life in general and the markets in particular you are able to 
grow. So, if a person thinks that trading is easy, or is something that 
would be great to do because the markets are only opened for a few hours a 
day then why not trade Potatoes, or Cocoa as a "day trader" then?

Successful traders are successful because they are masters of their mental 
environment, their computer models are only a outward manifestation of that 
mastery. They are successful because when they were becoming master traders 
they spent thousands of hours studying the markets. Often they became 
obsessed - they had no other thoughts but the markets. Even after becoming 
successful they still spend an ungodly amount of time reading and thinking. 
Spending 50 to 60 hours a week if you are a new trader is ludricious - how 
about 100-120 hours a week? Then once you can actually earn doubly digit 
returns for at least 5 years, then you can think about scaling back to 60 
or 70 hours a week! But you say that you only want to be a technical trader?

If the amount of hours seems too high, then may I suggest that you would 
have more fun going to Monte Carlo? In closing ask yourself one question, 
whom would you rather perform your heart by-pass surgery - a surgeon who 
loves his work so much that he spends 10 hours a week in actual surgery and 
then 70 hours a week reading and thinking about his profession, or a 
surgeon who loves the money and does the least amount of time studying to 
remain proficient, and the majority of the time swinging a club?

Great traders love what they do, and do not notice the amount of time they 
spend to remain the king of the hill - it is not work - it is actually fun!

Have a great summer guys & gals, I'm out of here till August!

Best regards,

John