[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I had the following life "QQQ" trade executed yesterday (on TS6):

(from long 800): sell 1600 shares QQQ at MARKET on 1/15/02 1:28:36 pm (price
was at 39.98)
Fills:
1/15/02 1:29:52 pm 800 QQQ at 39.9538
1/15/02 1:30:38 pm 800 QQQ at 39.9300  <= more than 2 minutes

Does that earn rewards now ?

Robert
===============================
Robert Linders
Orlando, FL
email: mugsnug@xxxxxxxxx
===============================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again


>
> Mark,
>
> Without desiring to be patronizing I can say that you can only effectively
> exercise concern on one issue if you don't create another one in the
> process.  I think most would say that by expressing yourself that way you
do
> create another issue. If you don't like TASC just don't subscribe. I got
> along fine without it until just a few months ago.  You can throw them
away
> like we can delete emails that we can't be bothered with. Deal with the
real
> issue and progress can sometimes be made.
>
>
> Jim Bronke
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Reader's Choice Awards - TASC Does it again
>
>
> :
> : Hello  Jim,
> :
> : JB> I had to think about this.
> :
> : good.
> :
> : JB> This is really not an appropriate comment.
> :
> : i agree - but neither is the perpetuated RAPE of the general public.
> :
> : JB> I have
> : JB> talked to the new editor(a few months back) and it is a she and it
is
> just
> : JB> not in good taste to make such an inference about a woman.
> :
> : the comment apply's to a business ethic or rather a lack thereof.
> :
> : JB> If you really think that TASC will compromise its' integrity by
> : JB> favoring software purely based upon advertising revenue then you
> : JB> can make that statement.
> :
> : then i can make that statement and feel i could certainly defend that
> : position  in  a court of law, at least here in the states.  i honestly
> : feel that s&c are crooks with absolutely no integrity at all.
> :
> : JB> But, keep it at that. For the sake of common courtesy on our list.
> : JB> OK?
> :
> : no excuses i stand by my act.
> :
> :
> : JB> Jim Bronke
> : JB> Phoenix, AZ
> :
> :
> :
> : --
> :
> : Have a Great Day, Mark
> :
> : http://www.markbrown.com
> :
> :
>
>
>