Re: A drastically revised and improved MS?

["wavemechanic" <wd78@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike:
 
Looks like a nice program.  Do you use it?  
If so, it would or great interest to learn how it compares 
to Metastock?  Also, is their free data update of good quality, and do 
they provide historical data (how far back)?
 
Bill
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  <A title=MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx";>MikeSuesserott 
  To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:59 
  AM
  Subject: AW: A drastically revised and 
  improved MS? 
  
  For an 
  alternative, you might take a look at <A 
  href="http://www.tarnsoft.com";>www.tarnsoft.com. (Disclaimer: no 
  connections etc.)
  <SPAN 
  class=498395511-12102001> 
  <SPAN 
  class=498395511-12102001>Regards,
  <SPAN 
  class=498395511-12102001> 
  Michael 
  Suesserott
  <SPAN 
  class=498395511-12102001> 
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <FONT face=Tahoma 
    size=2>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----Von: <A 
    href="mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Michel 
    AmelinckxGesendet: Friday, October 12, 2001 13:37An: 
    <A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxBetreff: 
    RE: A drastically revised and improved MS? 
    I 
    think exactly the same way as you but I got a VERY strong feeling that the 
    things you are hoping is just a dream,  Because don't forget that Equis 
    is now from Reuters and what does Reuters sell ? Correct data !  So it 
    is very logical they will and are already taking that pad.  Last 
    upgrade what were the new features apart the useless systems which are 
    password protected, yes Data on demand.
    <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2> 
    So 
    I believe he can only dream of the MS what is used to be.  And a very 
    bummer is that Supercharts seem to be of the market, is that correct ? Other 
    ways we don't have no where to go.  What would be a good alternative 
    ?
    <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2>Greetings
    <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2>M.
    
      
      <FONT 
      face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: 
      owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
      Behalf Of Allan WadeSent: vrijdag 12 oktober 2001 
      04:26To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: RE: A 
      drastically revised and improved MS? 
      
      <FONT face=Arial color=navy 
      size=2><SPAN 
      style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">You 
      make a good point. However, if you have emailed them suggestions in the 
      past and still have them filed somewhere, it wouldn&#8217;t take much effort to 
      send them off again. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to do. And then see where the 
      pieces fall.
      <FONT face=Arial color=navy 
      size=2><SPAN 
      style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">For 
      me personally, the next major release (whenever that may be) is going to 
      be the make or break. If they really improve the program, I&#8217;ll stay 
      forever and continue upgrading, buying their addins and data&#8230;If they put 
      all their effort into making it a &#8220;Tradestation.com&#8221; offering (making it 
      an online subscription using only their proprietary data and brokerage 
      house of their choice,  etc) 
      to try to suck more $$ out of us, I&#8217;m history. I&#8217;ll move to AmiBroker or 
      something else. I&#8217;ve always thought Metastock was the best charting 
      package, but not the best analysis package. Again, with a few 
      improvements, done with the user (and power user) in mind, they would be 
      the best. 
      <FONT face=Arial color=navy 
      size=2><SPAN 
      style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"> 
      <FONT 
      face="Comic Sans MS" color=blue><SPAN 
      style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'">Allan 
      Wade
      <SPAN 
      style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'">Phoenix, 
      AZ
      <SPAN 
      style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'">email: 
      <A 
      href="mailto:allanwade@xxxxxxxx";>allanwade@xxxxxxxx