|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Where can I get a description of this indicator?
Thanks
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: TraderJoe <ta-trader@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: Buff Moving Averages Problem
> Just got this from Support:
>
> There was a typo in this issue. The formula as printed was:
>
> X := Input( "Time Periods",1, 500, 25 );
> Sum( V * C, X ) / (Cum( V ) - Ref( Cum(V), X ))
>
>
> The last line needs to have a minus sign added in front of the last X.
The correct version looks like this:
>
> X := Input( "Time Periods",1, 500, 25 );
> Sum( V * C, X ) / (Cum( V ) - Ref( Cum(V), -X ))
>
>
> ---
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:54:41
> Lynn Dufrenne wrote:
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: j seed [mailto:jseed_10@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 12:46 PM
> >To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: Buff Moving Averages Problem
> >
> >
> >Ron,
> >I thought it was. Look at the ref statement.
> >
> >J.
> >
> >
> >>From: "Ron Scott" <ron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Subject: Buff Moving Averages Problem
> >>Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:27:40 -0700
> >>
> >>Has anyone programmed the Buff volume-weighted moving average from this
> >>month's TASC? I have, and it looks very strange. It plots with huge
> >>divergence from the Arms volume-adjusted moving average which is
supplied
> >>with Metastock. Something seems very wrong here. I'm wondering if the
> >>formula supplied in TASC Trader's Tips for Metastock is somehow
incorrect.
> >>I'd appreciate any help on this.
> >>
> >>Thanks-
> >>
> >>Ron Scott
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>
>
> Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
|