|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dan,
were you able to see smooth motion video, 30 frames per sec as we watch TV,
or was the video somewhat jerky (under 20 frames per second) or stop motion?
I watch CNBC in a small window on my computer but that is analog video fed
into my TECMAR PC/TV box to digitize and overlay.
But if the video comes over the net it has to be digital with compression.
Please give your comments re size of video window, smooth motion or stop motion,
and color rendition. Also how was the audio?
Regards,
STAN RUBENSTEIN
P.S. I agree the use of motion video of a conference call or analyst meeting
would be very democratizing over the net. If Wall St would let it happen.
At 05:21 PM 11/5/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Actually Chip,
>in an indirect way it is relevant. You see, the VXtreme streaming video
>program and plug-in was obtained from the CNN website. As we all know, CNN
>also covers financial news. It may be possible to see live CNN coverage of
>the markets on our PC's (now or in the future). Yesterday I downloaded the
>Microsoft NetShow program and viewed CourtTV live on the Net!
>
>I did warn this was off topic. I apologize for any inconvenience. If there
>are any messages you don't like, just delete them.
>
>Daniel L. Martinez
>
>
>
>In a message dated 97-11-05 16:41:41 EST, chipamy@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< I hate to have to write email like this but...come on guys... This is
> so far off topic it is not funny. Please take this conversation
> somewhere else. This is a forum for issues related to Metastock and
> Technical Analysis.
>
> Thanks,
> Chip
> >>
>
>
>---Arthur Rivet wrote:
>>
>> Dan Martinez wrote...
>> http://www.cnn.com/US/9711/04/au.pair.wrap/index.html
>>
>> This is off topic but I thought our British members would be
>interested in
>> this. This web page has coverage of the Au Pair convicted in
>Massachusetts.
>> I downloaded the VXtreme plug-in and watched the prosecution
>summation and
>> recommendation for life imprisonment. Because of the lack of
>coverage here
>> in California, I wasn't sure what to think. After seeing the
>prosecution's
>> summation, I now understand why she was convicted.
>>
>> I suspect in the future, we will be able to see all major trials in
>streaming
>> video on the web.
>>
>> Daniel L. Martinez
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----
>> Sorry Dan, but if you lived up here in Boston, and knew all the
>other B.S.
>> that surrounds the situation then you would know that there is a
>great deal
>> of PROBABLE DOUBT. They are putting a young woman away for LIFE, for
>> something she may not have done!!!!!. Who knows if the mother didnt
>drop the
>> child (who was very fussy) the nite before. Or 3 weeks before!!! Who
>knows
>> if the 2 year old brother didnt hit the child with a toy (playing
>with him)
>> by accident. And there is MORE!!! Sorry, she is
>INNOCENT,INNOCENT,INNOCENT.
>> (of the charges----murder).
>> Arthur
>
>
>
|