[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Online Stock Orders



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

e.Schwab was unavailable when I tried at 9:15-9:30 CST.  It was still very difficult at 10:45.  Very flakey, faulty downloads, long waits.  Had I wanted to trade today, I would have been very frustrated.

Datek, on the other hand, seemed just a little slow, not at all bad on delivering quotes and account information.

Jim Perry

----------
From: 	David_Radtke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx[SMTP:David_Radtke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 	Tuesday, October 28, 1997 4:21 PM
To: 	metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 	Re: Online Stock Orders

I couldn't even log into E-trade today between the hours of 6:30am &
11:00am PST, and I'm using a T-1 line, which is a very fast network
connection as opposed to a modem line. By the time I could get connected,
the market had advanced so much I wasn't able to take advantage of the
earlier discounts.

I have had problems like this in the past with E-trade, and was thinking
about switching to Datek, or more reliable service. I think my mind is made
up. E-Trade SUCKS! By the way, E-trades phone system was just as busy.

How did the other on-line brokers fair today? Did anyone else experience
similar problems?

David Radtke


                                                                  
 (Embedded                                                        
 image moved   metastock-list @ metastock.com                     
 to file:      10/28/97 11:37 AM                                  
 PIC19160.PCX)                                                    
                                                                  



To:   metastock-list @ equis.com
cc:    (bcc: David Radtke)
Subject:  Online Stock Orders




Has anyone used Etrade today (Tuesday) to buy/sell stock?  I was curious
to hear what the leadtime was on getting an order fillled.
How about other online ordering companies?  If Datek only took 1 minute,
that's pretty damn good.  Anyone using someone other than these two?  What
were your results?
Later,
Mike Salvucci
salvucci@xxxxxxxx






<<File: PIC19160.PCX>>