[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Downloader and Dial/Data



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Michael:

Thank you for your informative and perceptive comments.  Most programmers
haven't caught up with the pentium 75 and our computers still have a 66
mgherz bus.

Lionel Issen

At 12:04 AM 7/27/97 -0500, Michael L. Robb wrote:
>
>Going public means they will have brokerage analysts badgering them to
>pieces every week for earnings estimates.
>
> Mgmt will become fixated on quarterly profits; cost accounting will take
>over customer service. Their non-responsive tech support will decline even
>further.
>
> If now is the time for owner to bail out with a public offering you can be
>on the lookout for some radically better charting package on the horizon
>developed far away from Omega, that will cause all chart providers to either
>wake up or move aside.
>
>An interesting question now is really, just what is the state of the art in
>charting?
>
> Master Chartist used to be the leader. Subscribers got tired of renting. 
>
>Then came Omega with its programability. It became a hot item, and still is. 
>MS sort of came in strong and stayed there, but hasn't done anything lately,
>except try to get MS to work on W95. 
>
>Nirvana is a gorgeous program and faster than anything else in existence,
>but what? The new RT isn't ready yet? or it has problems? And it doesn't
>have enough programability. Does anyone know?
>
>What about Papyrus? They ran full page color ads when they came out with
>their first offerings. They had everything. Better than Omega and MS
>combined. But where are they now?   I don't see them advertising much
>anymore. What happened? Was it too expensive and didn't sell in volume? Did
>it have flaws?
>
>With 56 bps satellite feeds on 18" dishes ready now, and ISDN 128,000bps
>lines coming in from phone companies at reasonable prices, and 300Mhz
>SuperPro Pentium II's available soon at $1299 where is the super duper
>software going to come from? 
>
>It is fairly clear that the programmers are staying far behind the hardware.
>Is that because all the good ones are being hired away by the big bonehead
>managers to try and fix their y2k problems?
>
>How much would it cost to hire some Russian and Chinese programmers to
>create a new custom program, with modular units to permit rapid expansion to
>overcoming all the minor irritances we see expressed here every day on data
>handling, charting  inadequacies, etc. etc. 
>
>
>
>