|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I fully agree with you Joel.
Metastock would add great value to their software should they add the
possibility to group stocks the way AIQ does so we could make analysis at
group and industry level.
Also, should they add the possibility to capture fundamental data from data
supplier like Quote Plus and give their client the possibility to scan
stock on fundamentals then Metastock would be real leader in TA analysis.
In the context of fast technological advance, the strategy for a company to
stay in the game is to cannibalise its actual product. This means to
develop new product that kills previous one. This is the best way to keep
competition in the dust.
I hope for Metastock than they understand that because some other companies
do.
================================================
Robert Duplain Email:
rduplain@xxxxxxxxxxxx
================================================
-----Message d'origine-----
De: Joel Beck
Date: 23 juillet, 1997 00:49
À: meta
Objet: Fundamentals?
Hi Everyone,
Am I the only MetaStock user that feels that fundamentals are an important
factor in selecting a stock to invest in?
MetaStock has a great user interface for doing technical analysis, but it
seems to me that it's missing at least half (if not more) of the equation.
I feel that based upon my (admittedly limited) experience, there are many
more factors that influence the direction of a stock. I've read in IBD in
AIQ's TradingExpert add that the following determine the price pattern of
stocks: "49% is due to the industry, 31% to the market and only 20% to the
company itself." I'm not sure of the exact percentages, but from what I've
be able to see, that seems VERY accurate to me. If this is indeed true,
wouldn't one be wise to take a look at these other factors in making their
investments?
Why don't I just buy AIQ's Trading Expert? Because I think that MetaStock
is a more solid program and would add the following features would be
|