[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] SEC proclamation



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hey I hope not mine Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Simms
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [RT] SEC proclamation

Wow - you are so smart...can I kiss your ass ?
 


From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of hostmaster
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:36 PM
To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RT] SEC proclamation

It is far better to remain silent and be thought a fool rather than speak out and remove all doubt.

None the less, you have opted to speak out.  So let me put short shift to your hyperbole.

The SEC is halting NAKED short selling, not short selling.  Short selling is a useful and natural feedback mechanism for markets. It is even more so when enforced in conjuction with the uptick rule.  Naked shorting OTH is solely for speculation and not for hedging of investment positions.  The societal purpose of markets is for investors.  Speculators and traders have their place in the market to help provide liquidity. However, naked shorting does not provide any useful or constructive function to markets and will not be missed as it was not missed for the 150+ years it didn't exist in the markets.

Just as margin requirements are a valid and useful market regulator, so are balancing tools such as prohibition of naked shorting.

Boater805

At 05:55 PM 9/18/2008, you wrote:

SEC to halt short selling
 
What would happen if it were:
SEC to halt Long Buying
 
What's the difference ?
 
It is a totally biased action on their part.
 

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___