|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
what are the 2 diffrent symbols?
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Nopper
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:09 am
Subject: RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> No, no mistake, I trade it on the CME each and every day. Yes,
> ICE has had
> its version for a few months now, but volume is around 700
> contracts per day
> compared to the CME version which averages over 200,000 per day.
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of RB
> Sent: November 19, 2007 10:29 PM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000
>
>
>
> You may be mistaken.
>
>
>
> I believe ICE got it months ago.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Mark Simms
>
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:49 PM
>
> Subject: RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000
>
>
>
> Huge mistake IMHO for the CME dropping this volatile derivative.
>
> I don't quite "get it"...and told them so.
>
> But alas, they are now a monopoly and can do what they
> want....and have CFTC
> approval.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Nopper
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:37 PM
> To: e-mini_traders_anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; RealTraders
> Subject: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000
>
> The CME will be delisting the ER2 contract at the expiry of the
> Sept '08
> contract and ICE already has its version up and running. Volume,
> of course,
> is pathetic with barely 1000 contracts traded in a day, but that
> shouldchange.
>
> My only knowledge of ICE is from the frequent alerts from Interactive
> Brokers that the ICE platform is down. I've seen no mention on
> these lists
> of any concerns by traders of the move to ICE, whether the
> volume will be
> the same as it is now, whether the CME will introduce a similar
> index and
> what impact that will have, etc., etc.
>
> Any thoughts anyone?
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
__._,_.___
![]()
__,_._,___
|