RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000, RealTraders Email List Archive

No, no mistake, I trade it on the CME each and every day. Yes, ICE has had its version for a few months now, but volume is around 700 contracts per day compared to the CME version which averages over 200,000 per day.

Andrew

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RB
Sent: November 19, 2007 10:29 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000

You may be mistaken.

I believe ICE got it months ago.

----- Original Message -----

From: Mark Simms

To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:49 PM

Subject: RE: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000

Huge mistake IMHO for the CME dropping this volatile derivative.

I don't quite "get it"...and told them so.

But alas, they are now a monopoly and can do what they want....and have CFTC approval.

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Nopper
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:37 PM
To: e-mini_traders_anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; RealTraders
Subject: [RT] E-mini Russell 2000

The CME will be delisting the ER2 contract at the expiry of the Sept '08
contract and ICE already has its version up and running. Volume, of course,
is pathetic with barely 1000 contracts traded in a day, but that should
change.

My only knowledge of ICE is from the frequent alerts from Interactive
Brokers that the ICE platform is down. I've seen no mention on these lists
of any concerns by traders of the move to ICE, whether the volume will be
the same as it is now, whether the CME will introduce a similar index and
what impact that will have, etc., etc.

Any thoughts anyone?

Andrew

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___