|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Funny, an
"expert" fund manager on CNBC on Friday said the economy is so dependant upon
tech, especially communications, that nothing is coming back until telecom
improves.
I guess we are
"dead in the water" then.
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: ira
[mailto:mr.ira@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 4:33
PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] One
dummy down, more to go....5 telecom companines in my area
are no more and a 6th just left the land of the living this week end.
M. Simms wrote:
NBBBKEHLDCKBLEOJNJDJOEBNMPAA.prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
type="cite">re:"But your assessment of there pressure on W is wishful thinking"We shall see.....my take is that massive malcontent is building in thecountry.re: "W's vulnerability is that the economy is so broken it won't respondnormally or there's another terror incident that can be traced tomissteps of his administration"This is already a distinct possibility.....both advertising and informationtechnology sectors have already declined as sharp as the overall economy didin 1929. Many of those businesses experiencing 50 to 90% declines inrevenue.
-----Original Message-----From: Jim Johnson [mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:30 PMTo: M. SimmsCc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....Hello M.,I do agree with you that W's domestic team, esp the econ team, is weakand ineffectual. I hope he cleans house for the good of the US and hisadministration. But your assessment of there pressure on W is wishfulthinking. He is bullet proof for longer than 6 months. The Pittresignation would have had more political advantage for Bush had itbeen done the <day before> the election. It would have shown W to beconcerned about corp corruption and all that blather the libs spout.In my opinion W is perfectly situated for re-elect
ion. Market hasdeclined in first two years, rates get slashed. year 3 of electioncycle clicks in soon, maybe already. market rallies into Nov, 04.Dem's will put Pelosi in as minority leader. she will embarrass theDem's every day. Gray Davis will be a persona non grata by Nov, 04and W will attempt to retake California. Dem's are already switchingparties in the Georgia house. This looks to me like a replay ofReagan's reign--tax cuts, economy pops, deficit that doesn't reallymatterW's vulnerability is that the economy is so broken it won't respondnormally or there's another terror incident that can be traced tomissteps of his administration.that's my wishful thinking :)Best regards, Jim Johnson mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx--Friday, November 8, 2002, 5:54:43 PM, you wrote:MS> I don't see
it happening....MS> I haven't heard about government "CUT-BACKS" or "REDUCTIONS"or "CUT THEMS> PORK" in YEARS......MS> In fact, many agencies, like the Copyright Bureau are crying forMS> money....much more money.
-----Original Message-----From: Charles Meyer [mailto:chaze@xxxxxxxx]Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:59 PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....Simms & Group-I think the great unknown is whether or not Bush can surroundhimself with
the right peoplewho understand that dire fiscal policies (lower taxes/reducedspending/cutting some agencies)are going to be needed to stave off the continuing deflationaryeconomy nowthat the monetarygenie is out of the bottle. Also; will the administrationthen have the
backbone to carry out thosenecessary policies; which may be politically painful toexecute. The left
may begin to scream likestuffed pigs. It would appear that he now has a mandate to dowhatever is
necessary; but his administration must act with boldness.chas----- Original Message -----From: M. Simms <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:21 PMSubject: RE: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....
That was TOTALLY APPARENT TO THE ENTIRE NATION.......Bush knew this, and to avoid looking STUPID himself, he thusasked Harveyto
leave gracefully.The pressure is now on Bush to take his REMAINING shabbycrew, whip them
into shape, and make some good decisions and great action. He'sgot about6
months.
-----Original Message-----From: BobsKC [mailto:bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:12 AMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: RE: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....Some speakers use monitors mounted at an angle so they appear tobe lookingat the camera while others read from notes as their eyesight is notconducive to the monitor. I don't think Harvey everunderstood what the
job consisted of and I still think we need a ruling against anylawyers inWashington. Out of congress, out of the cabinet, out ofappointments.
BobAt 09:46 AM 11/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Harvey Pitt's outgoing speech totally confirms my assertion thatHarvey was
not the "sharpest tool in the shed"...Why ? He had to READ every word of his speech.In contrast to another speaker I witnessed: Scott McNealy ofSun Micro
talked for 2 hours - no notes, no reading, much more complexsubject as
well.
-----Original Message-----From: M. Simms [mailto:prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:51 PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: RE: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....It was a great tactic to leave on electionnite.......very smart.
Boy, do we have some stupid people in government right now....just when we need the "best", we have the "worst".
-----Original Message-----From: Jim Johnson [mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:14 PMTo: M. SimmsCc: RealtradersListSubject: Re: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....Hello M.,What I can't understand is why W didn't zap Harvey a few daysbefore
the election--it surely would have been to his advantage.Did alright
without that tactic however.Best regards, Jim Johnsonmailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx
--Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 7:09:07 PM, you wrote:MS> Bye, bye Harvey.....good riddance......MS> Lindsay's on the ropes.....MS> who's next ?MS> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:MS> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMS> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject toMS> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
MS> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:MS> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMS> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/MS> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:MS> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMS> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/To unsubscribe from this group, send an em
ail to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|