|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<SPAN
class=370361202-07122001>Uncanny. I would say this is a critical and defining
juncture.
<SPAN
class=370361202-07122001>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Steve
[mailto:gts@xxxxxx]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:25
PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: WAVES -
was RE: [RT] Jon88keys!
Price and Time both at 0.618
Steve
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
Don
Ewers
To: <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:50
PM
Subject: Re: WAVES - was RE: [RT]
Jon88keys!
Just noticed the S&P cash high on the weekly so far
(1173.62) came almost tothe .382 retracement (1176) off of the high
(full retracements shown on thefar right of the chart), an interesting
number when you also tie the 200dayMA (1176.36) on the daily into
approximately the same level.Not shown but from the wave 4 high to
the wave 5 low a .618 retracement is1174.92.So there is some
confluence in here and an interesting place for the marketto at least
pause (albeit maybe only for a moment with the employment
reporttomorrow)?Still think a further move up will "really" get
any short nervious too?don ewers----- Original Message
-----From: "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001
3:31 PMSubject: Re: WAVES - was RE: [RT] Jon88keys!> I
forgot to mention the "PTI on the first daily chart of 3 (red
number)".>> It has had a reading below the "required 34" since
10-3-01, (when it went> from 37 to 28) which has said that the
probability any evential wave 5down> (should it occur) would be a
double bottom at best or at worst a failed5th> wave (meaning it
just keeps going up), which is in fact what has occured.So> very
early warning was given there plus the count on the wwekly
chartbeing> 5 wave complete.>> The point I try to
make to those that get too caught up in count changesis> who
cares if you are on the right side of the market? Example, the
charts> sent before has the first one in a wave 4 rally up, which
turn out to be a> 1-2-3 rally up, either way you would be long.
Once the wave 3 expends> itself and a wave 4 correction starts on the
second chart, does it matter> wether it is a wave 4 correction, a
wave B, no, you are on the right sideof> the market?> don
ewers>> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Don Ewers"
<dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 3:03 PM> Subject: Re: WAVES - was RE: [RT]
Jon88keys!>>> > (with charts, sorry)>
>> > M. Simms> > You must be psychic, the count
changed on the daily S&P cash on 12-4-01> > (first chart) from
a 1-2-3-4 (down) to on 12-5-01 (second chart) to an> A-B-C>
> (down) and 1-2-3 (up), since as you said the wave 4 retraced too
far.> >> > Of further interest is the 200 MA, the brown
line on the chart?> >> > Since I have been using the
weekly as my primary "roadmap" which already> had> > 5
waves at the lows (third chart) in which many fib targets were met),>
some> > have been anticipating this change in count on the
daily to result and> are> > looking at the wave 4 daily to
evolve in an large ABC patterneventually?> > Perhaps the new
wave 4 daily (or wave B?) could be the pullback many are> >
expecting too?> > don ewers> >> > -----
Original Message -----> > From: "M. Simms"
<prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Sent: Thursday, December
06, 2001 2:00 PM> > Subject: WAVES - was RE: [RT]
Jon88keys!> >> >> > > Speaking of
WAVES......> > > does anyone with AGet know if it has "thrown
in the towel" onnumbering> > this> > > latest
move-up as Wave #4 out of 5 down ?> > > I believe all
indications are that #4 was really #5 and that we are in> #1>
> of> > > 5 - up.> > >> >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----> > >
> From: Ralph Volpe [mailto:rjv@xxxxxxxxxx]> > > > Sent:
Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:11 PM> > > > To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [RT]
Jon88keys!> > > >> > > >> > >
> Jon88, thanks for your response. I agree with you, the market>
> > > moves in waves and> > > > there's no sure
methodology to predict a move; however, the waves> > > > we
speak of> > > > very often have a bias in intensity one way
or another. It is my> > > > opinion, based> > >
> on an assessment of economic fundamentals and> > > >
reaction/counter-reaction market> > > > movements, this
market is hurting -- and the hurt will be felt> > > >
shortly on the> > > > downside.> > >
>> > > > Ralph> > > >> > >
> jon88keys@xxxxxxx wrote:> > > >> > > >
> In a message dated 12/6/2001 1:39:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,>
> > > rjv@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > writes:>
> > > >> > > > > << Dorothy, are you
still out there? Some time ago I posted> long-term> > >
> > charts of the NASD and INDU with my analysis that this
market> > > > was in for> > > > > a
nice rise. Well, I think this rise should end by Monday of next> >
week.> > > > > My question to you, Dorothy, and
others, do you share my view on> the> > > >
> vulnerability of this market or should we succumb to the>
> > > 'talking heads'> > > > > again with
their exuberance for a rebound?> > > > >
>>> > > > >> > > > > I'm not
Dorothy, but the Dow has been in overbought territory> > > >
for some time> > > > > now. I would expect at least
a correction pretty soon. A> > > > correction would
be> > > > > healthy, even. But we're just surfers riding
the wave and> > > > moving our stops.> > > >
> I have no problem with the market moving to infinity, either
:).> > > > >> > > > > But answering
your question: sure the market's vulnerable.> > > >
But the market's> > > > > always vulnerable (hence the
word "market" as opposed to "sure> > thing").> > >
> >> > > > > Kowobunga dudes (and
dudettes),> > > > >> > > > >
Jonathan> > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > > To unsubscribe from
this group, send an email to:> > > >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to> > <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > >> > >> > >
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >
>> > >> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to> <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> >> > >> >> >> > To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to<A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to:>
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|