[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Elliott Wave



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Steve, Miner takes the second approach ... stating clearly in his work
that about 50% of EW is tradable and the rest should be ignored. I am
indebted to him for making EW practical enough for day to day use in my
trading.

Earl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven W. Poser (psn)" <swp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [RT] Elliott Wave


> Earl -
>
> I am only familiar with Bob Miner's work on a second hand basis. I
have seen
> positive and negative reviews of his stuff, though far more positive
than
> negative. I definitely agree with the overly complex approach not
making
> sense. Miner's approach though says that maybe it works and maybe it
does
> not -- at least according to what others have told me. To me, that is
not
> totally valid either.
>
> However, if Miner is saying there are times where wave counts are not
> decipherable (as in during complex corrections) and you should not
waste
> time trying to take s-t trading cues from them, I would agree. That
said, a
> complex correction may be bit of information one could use to come up
with
> an options trading strategy.
>


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/152424/_/974502712/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx