|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><STRONG>Is there a contest on Real Traders for most
obnoxious posts? If so, Mark Brown has won it hands down. If he is
so brilliant why can't he just make meaningful contributions to the forum like
Earl, Ira, Gitanshu, et al rather than these vicious unwarranted attacks on
another contributor. It is really getting old.</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill D</FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:jvc689@xxxxxxxxxxx"; title=jvc689@xxxxxxxxxxx>Dr. John
Cappello</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 29, 1999 5:22
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [RT] Re: Free Internet Stock
Research Update</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Dear Mark,<BR><BR>Thank you so much for misunderstanding
another one of my posts.I posted a <BR>website that had a system that was
monitored on a monthly basis publicly <BR>before and after it happened.You can
not get better audited than that.I made <BR>no claim to inventing it so go
back to remedial reading for pseudo <BR>millionaires.<BR><BR>Secondly what I
posted had new information.I guess I really should clear <BR>everything
through you but someone told me I did not have to.<BR><BR>With much love to
such a kind fellow [Gitanshu would want me to say that <BR>because he is too
much of a gentleman].You are so outrageous my sides split <BR>laughing just
thinking about how you knowingly took someone else's work <BR>without
referencing it,rationalize it and move on like that is
ethical.<BR><BR>Browningl yours,<BR><BR>John<BR><BR><BR>>From: "Mark Brown"
<<A
href="mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>Reply-To:
Mark Brown <<A
href="mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>To:
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>CC:
RealTradersList <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>Subject:
[RT] Re: Free Internet Stock Research Update<BR>>Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999
14:33:19 -0600<BR>><BR>>Hello Doc.,<BR>><BR>>DJC> Someone
wanted to know when MAWI was first posted.<BR>><BR>>So why did you write
all of us?<BR>><BR>>DJC> I also posted my version of the stock market
heat map on MSN which did <BR>>875%<BR>>DJC> in 11 months and which I
will trade next year in addition to my own <BR>>picks<BR>>DJC> and
posts.<BR>><BR>>Wow ! Then now maybe you can afford to get a real email
account?<BR>><BR>>Too bad your stats are not professionally
and independently audited!<BR>>Because with claims
like you make- if true, you would soon own
the<BR>>world.<BR>><BR>>Oh yea I resisted
posting this but someone wrote me privately and<BR>>request
I posted it so it would waste band width. I have no
control<BR>>over it you see. BTW I'm now developing a heat map
too!<BR>><BR>>DR. Mark<BR>><BR>><BR>> >>Thanks,<BR>>
>><BR>> >>John<BR>> >><BR>>
>>______________________________________________________<BR>>
>>Get Your Private, Free Email at <A
href="http://www.hotmail.com";>http://www.hotmail.com</A><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>--<BR>>Best
regards,<BR>> Mark
Brown
<A
href="mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>><BR>><BR><BR>______________________________________________________<BR>Get
Your Private, Free Email at <A
href="http://www.hotmail.com";>http://www.hotmail.com</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Dec 29 22:25:48 1999
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA21657
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:49:44 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:43:25 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:39:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 55933 invoked by uid 0); 30 Dec 1999 01:40:48 -0000
Message-ID: <19991230014048.55932.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from 63.24.238.176 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:40:48 PST
X-Originating-IP: [63.24.238.176]
From: "Dr. John Cappello" <jvc689@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] [Fwd: Stocks under $10]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:40:48 EST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: jvc689@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: jvc689@xxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Dear Ira,
I have been watching MT [Meditrust] for a year and watched it drift from $16
to its current seemingly attractive status.Insiders were selling in the
teens and buying at $9 and under.
In REIT land it is one of the lowest rated but the dividend and revenue to
meet that dividend appear to be there.Institutions hold about 45% of the
stock but are slightly net sellers.
I even looked at their last SEC filing and saw no red flags.The only thing
that I can think of is that it is involved in assisted living facilities
which received some bad press.
They also do little to no PR to obtain price appreciation should they need
furure equity to expand.I checked the analysts and there are 9 Holds and no
buys or sells.
My conclusion is I would buy it for the dividend and the appreciation which
may follow...but I would wait for some move up or more insider buying.
Thanks for bringing it forth.
John
>From: Ira Tunik <ist@xxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ist@xxxxxx
>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [RT] [Fwd: Stocks under $10]
>Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:55:45 -0800
>
>
><< message3.txt >>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|