|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
RT,
Here is the latest installment from Mr. Murrey.
Return-Path: <tmurrey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.datatek.com (socrates.datatek.com [205.219.244.22])
by fh102.infi.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA00062
for <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 29 Jun 1997 02:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail.datatek.com from localhost
(router,SLMail V2.5); Sun, 29 Jun 1997 01:30:36 -0600
Received: by mail.datatek.com from tmurrey.datatek.com
(205.219.244.97::mail daemon; unverified,SLMail V2.5); Sun, 29 Jun 1997 01:30:35 -0600
From: "tmurrey" <tmurrey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: X-Raying "Murrey on the Market". Warning: Contains Commercial Content
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 1997 01:31:41 -0700
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19970629013036.aca0b574.in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have an 84 I.Q. and I can show you more knowlege on a piece of plain
typing paper than you ever learned in college, if you could just count to
64. thanks THmurrey
----------
> From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: X-Raying "Murrey on the Market". Warning: Contains Commercial
Content
> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 1997 3:35 AM
>
> Dear RT,
> The end of March, 1997, I had occassion to correspond with the now
> all too familiar Mr Murrey. In the interest of possilby getting a peak
> into Mr. Murrey's secret theories and thoughts, below I have forwarded
> to you our correspondace in full and unedited. The final corrspondance
> shows my asking some questions and requesting documentation from Mr.
> Murrey to support his claims. I is my recollection that there was no
> reply to that request and no forthcoming offer to provide any evidence
> of his claims of succcess. I will leave all conclusions to you. I look
> forward to your feedback. Also, I apologize in advance for the
> commercial pollution this post may cause to the RT. I weighed the
> plusses and minuses and decided that whatever evidence can be provided,
> other than
> the recent blatant advertising, maybe illuminating in revealng the real
> T. Murrey. I hope the attached correspondace helps. I look forward
> to your feedback.
> Warning: The attached material below may not be sutiable for those
> with a low threshold for commercial content. Proceed at your own risk.
>
|