[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Recreating the back adjusted vistorical number



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Try using an unadjusted price series for the futures and select two of the contract expiration dates as the starting an ending points, respectively.

Bob Fulks

At 01:46 PM 10/28/2009, you wrote:
>I'm not sure I follow you .. let me say it a slightly different way:
>The end prices are the same (1050) .. 
>The capital gains available in each time series must be identical so the net
>price change AFTER CARRY is the same
>Therefore the forward price of the index = the start price of the
>back-adjusted contract
>So far, very easy .. now what is the calculation that does that.  I (think
>I)know that too:
>Start price*(1+net carry)^periods = fwd price
>
>That's all there is to this  (as far as I can tell) so now I am struggling
>to get that implied net carry number to make some sense
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: DH [mailto:catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:04 AM
>To: Omega List
>Subject: Re: Recreating the back adjusted vistorical number
>
>You're never going to get it to work using back-adjusted (addition 
>method) contracts and calculating percentage gain/loss. If the real 
>contract went from 100 to 110, that's a 10% gain. If your adjusted 
>contract goes from 500 to 510 over the same time period, that's only a 
>2% gain. I don't see any easy way to reconcile the two. Bad data in, bad 
>result out.
>
>-- 
>   Dennis