[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dynastore light



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Would the 64 byte buffer of the TEcard provide any advantage over the 16
byte 16550 uarts that are standard on motherboards when used with Dynastore
on the same machine as TS4, or separate machines?  I thought the 16550's
would overflow in heavy data periods.  Is it infact better to use Dynastore
on a separate machine from TS4?  I don't have Dynastore yet and am just
getting familiar with configuration options and how best to go about it
after dumping BMI.  I am using a TurboExpress card with DTN and ProSuite at
460800 baud but am considering the use of Dynastore to keep TS4 running as
the tick filtering on BMI is hazardous to trade with to say the least.

BobRoeske

----- Original Message -----
From: Glen Bretsnyder <bret@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: Dynastore light


> If you already have 2 serial ports capable of 56k baud, the Turbo Express
> card is not required. Turbo express also sells their software seperately
for
> about $50. This software will allow you to triple the port that TS4 uses
to
> read data. See the dynastore video (in the help section) for details and
> ignore the references to the card.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BobR <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Ron Dawes <ron@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 1:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Dynastore light
>
>
> > Is there any possibility that Dynastore could be configured to work with
> the
> > USB ports?  That would save a hundred bucks for the Turbo Express card,
> > eliminating the need to open the computer and install a PCI card, and
> > provide a higher bandwidth than the serial card.  Later this year USB2
may
> > be available with even higher bandwidth.
> >
> > Bob Roeske
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Ron Dawes <ron@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ian Cunningham <CunCom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 10:26 AM
> > Subject: RE: Dynastore light
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I read that on their Website. They refer you to a company that has a
> work
> > > around to bandwidth limits up to 56 k on TS4. They also said that with
> > > futures TS4 did fine that only with stocks did the bandwidth present a
> > problem.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> > > At 11:47 AM 5/12/00 -0500, Ron Dawes wrote:
> > > >The performance topic we discuss on the web site relates to when DS
is
> > used
> > > >with TS4 and the bandwidth limitations of the serial port.  This
> > > >consideration does not apply to when DS is used with TS2K.  DS does
not
> > > >impose any particular performance limitations itself when compared to
> the
> > > >original DBC data manager.  TS charting and/or RadarStation screening
> > > >consume the vast majority of CPU time when looking at a lot of
symbols
> or
> > > >doing a lot of charts and studies.
> > > >
> > > >Ron
> > > >www.dynastorelight.com
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Ian Cunningham [mailto:CunCom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > >Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 11:14 AM
> > > >To: INTERNET:omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: re:Dynastore light
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Paula,
> > > >
> > > >One thing I neglected to mention as it dosen't affect me
> > > >is, if you collect a large number of symbols real-time
> > > >this will affect performance. I only collect enough to
> > > >trade the SP RT and use Dynaloader to collect any other
> > > >Data needed EOD. I believe there is info on their web site
> > > >on this or maybe someone else can address this if ti's a problem for
> you.
> > > >
> > > >Ian
> > > >
> > > >Message text written by INTERNET:omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >Paula,
> > > >
> > > >I had been a BMI user for 10 + years. I reluctantly tried DS/TS4
> > > >when I couldn't get the dish to work in a new location. After some
> > > >scepticism due to ignorance on my part in the setup process I have
> > > >been pleasantly surprised. Its much faster than BMI and monitoring
> > > >against Squawk is positive. Tech support is very good. Once it's
> > > >setup it's a breeze to use and, if I can set it up, anybody can.
> > > >Of course being internet based you are at the mercy of your
connection
> > > >but the product does what it claims to do. With the addition of
> > Dynaloader
> > > >this is an excellent package IMO.
> > > >
> > > >Ian Cunningham.<
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>