[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: c:\programs\omegaresearch\mywork



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I do not have an idea on management of it, but I think Omega might be
willing to change it since it adds sellable eye candy.

Just like with workspaces that supports subdirectories and are easy to
organise, I would love to be able to organise my indicators and systems in a
similar fashion (guess I test to many trading ideas). If I could place them
under different directories in powereditor, then we have a lot of nice eye
candy, and I would be capable of having directories for signals/indicators
saying for example "profitable","under test","gives some good result but not
good enough","fetched from code list", ...

This would also solve the "I do not dare to import this indicator" problem,
if you imported it to a subdirectory, your system would still be safe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Wright [mailto:lwright@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 6:29 AM
> To: ROBERT ROESKE
> Cc: Omega List
> Subject: Re: c:\programs\omegaresearch\mywork
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, ROBERT ROESKE wrote:
> 
> > Am wondering how other ts2k users are managing this file, 
> if anyone is.
> > Looks like it gets bigger and bigger the more TS2k is used. 
>  Mine is up to
> > 21.9MB with 2,102 files.  This may sound like a dumb 
> question, but after a
> > few years of work it would consume a large amount of disk space.  It
> > contains these types of files:
> 
> I've also noticed this, and also have about 2k files - and 
> only a small
> fraction of my TS4 studies have been transferred! It seems 
> that TS2k dumps
> almost *everything* there! I sometimes go in and rename 
> files, etc, but it
> gets to be a big hassle to even *find* what I'm looking for. 
>  
> In (unfortunately) true Omega style, the "management", bad as 
> it is, is
> done entirely in TS, so again we can do only what Omega 
> allows us to do. 
> A much more logical structure would be to assign 
> subdirectories for the
> various categories, to at least keep the different kinds of things
> separate. It does not seem as though this was thought out very well. 
> 
> I've tried to use subdir's, but can't get TS to look anywhere 
> else except
> the main dir. Anyone know a way to do this? 
> 
> In typical Omega style, their fix will probably be to 
> *totally* obfuscate
> what's in there as they have with the studies - use names such as
> T000023.asc, which won't be an ASCII file, of course, and the 
> real name
> will be known only to the 'index' file. This insures that any glitches
> will cause the maximum number of problems. Their solution for problems
> would be to simply recreate all the files again - hey, no 
> problem, right? 
> 
> A little better organization in TS would lessen the problems 
> for all of 
> us, Omega included. 
> 
> On second thought, changes of this type would not add more 
> eye candy, and
> would have no impact on dog-and-pony demos and marketing - 
> therefore it
> will probably NOT get done. 
> 
> If someone has any ideas about management of this junkpile, 
> I'd like to
> know too... 
> 
> Larry
>