[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the linux myth



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


interesting article but the argument there did not mention
what machines and which os power the services that Linux
cannot ... so, it seems to be just another bias opinion :)

just check what power the complete yahoo sites ... it is 
a great surprise ...

so, if linux cannot do it, then windows whatever will definitely fail!

remember what pcmag said and the writer of this article said when 
the imac was introduced ... they said imac would not sell, period.
with authorative tone, they blasted everything about it ... so
the pattern is obvious - pcmag should be renamed WinTel Mag :)

-Lawrence Chan

----------
> From: nonlinear <keptinkaos@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: the linux myth
> Date: Saturday, September 18, 1999 6:32 PM
> 
> http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/opinions/0,7802,2327771,00.html
> 
> "Linux often fails, simply because it isn't robust enough. Contractors
> know this but fear the wrath of the Linux community." - Dvorak
> 
> pretty interesting opinion piece....several comments include: linux
> cannot handle the loads on an irc, which makes me wonder how it could
> handle the flood of data from the providers any better than
> nt4/win2000; and, it's being dumped (ie, booted) in the business arena
> because it ain't robust enough to handle industrial strength app's, so
> now it's targeted as an os (with beos as a competitor) for the sub-$200
> puter market. that doesn't sound particularly encouraging for a trading
> platform.
> 
> i get the impression that linux will always remain a quaint hacker os
> and a neverending wannabe microsloth slayer for those who hate gates.
> 
> TJ
>