|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot reply to this message via email because you have chosen not
to disclose your email address to the group.
To reply: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/post?act=reply&messageNum=5494
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for all the continued tweaking, YS.
Harold
--- In equismetastock@xxxx, "yellowstoneuk" <yellowstoneuk@xxxx>
wrote:
> ---You are correct, that was an oversight on my part and the
amended
> columns b & c required are shown below:--
>
> colb :-If(ROC(C ,20 ,% ),>,Ref(ROC(C ,260 ,% ),-20),If(ROC
> (C ,20 ,% ),>,0,1,0),0)
>
> colc :-If(ROC(C ,65 ,% ),>,Ref(ROC(C ,130 ,% ),-65),If(ROC
> (C ,65 ,% ),>,0,1,0),0)
>
>
> In equismetastock@xxxx, "Barry Seeger" <barry.seeger@xxxx> wrote:
> > I wondered about that. There is another issue too: in cols B &
C,
> the
> > short-term ROC's were required to not only be larger than the
> > long-terms, but also they had to be greater than zero. How would
> you
> > include that requirement?
> > Barry
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: yellowstoneuk [mailto:yellowstoneuk@x...]
> > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 9:32 AM
> > To: equismetastock@xxxx
> > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: momentum exploration
> >
> > --I have amended the exploration to reference the previous period
> in
> > each of the columns b,c,d. On an exploration on the same date
> there
> > were a lot more hits produced with the amended columns. The
amount
> > in column E is easily changes from 0.50 to $5 or any alternative
> > minimum.
> >
> > COLUMN A If(C,>=,HHV(C,260)*0.8,1,0)
> > COLUMN B If(ROC(C ,20 ,% ),>,Ref(ROC(C ,260 ,% ),-20),1,0)
> > COLUMN C If(ROC(C ,65 ,% ),>,Ref(ROC(C ,130 ,% ),-65),1,0)
> > COLUMN D If(ROC(C ,130 ,% ),>,Ref(ROC(C ,260 ,% ),-130),1,0)
> > COLUMN E If(C,>,5.00,1,0)
> > COLUMN F Sum(VOLUME,10)/10
> > Filter When(colA,=,1) AND When(colB,=,1) AND When(colC,=,1)
AND
> > When(colD,=,1) AND When(colE,=,1) AND When(colF,>,40000)
> >
> >
> > - In equismetastock@xxxx, "Yngvi Hardarson" <hardy@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > It may i.a. hinge on how volume is quoted by your data vendor.
> > > If you're running ReutersDatalink then I think they divide
> > > all volume by a factor of 100.
> > >
> > > Yngvi Hardarson
> > > hardy@xxxx
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: hcour [mailto:no_reply@x...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 07:04
> > > To: equismetastock@xxxx
> > > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: momentum exploration
> > >
> > >
> > > I ran it yesterday. The original screen on Multexinvestor came
> up
> > > with about 30 stocks, 24 of which are in my MS database. When I
> > ran
> > > the MS exploration I only came up with 1 result. So, yeah,
> > something
> > > is definitely not right somewhere.
> > >
> > > Harold
> > >
> > > --- In equismetastock@xxxx, "Barry Seeger" <barry.seeger@xxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > > I appreciated reading this exchange, and put it aside for
> later
> > > study
> > > > for my own learning. I could be mistaken, but there appear
to
> > be a
> > > > couple of small errors: colb and colc don't seem to require
> > that
> > > the
> > > > ROC's be >0, and in cole, should 0.5 be 5.0, or even 500,
> > depending
> > > on
> > > > your data? No offence intended to the brilliant
> yellowstoneuk,
> > but
> > > I
> > > > thought I would pass these observations on.
> > > > Barry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: hcour [mailto:no_reply@x...]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 12:17 PM
> > > > To: equismetastock@xxxx
> > > > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: momentum exploration
> > > >
> > > > YS -
> > > >
> > > > Wow. That is fantastic. Thanks so much. Can't wait to try it
> out!
> > > >
> > > > Harold
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxx, "yellowstoneuk"
> <yellowstoneuk@xxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > cola If(C,>=,HHV(C,260)*0.8,1,0)
> > > > >
> > > > > colb If(ROC(C ,20 ,% ),>,ROC(C ,260 ,% ),1,0)
> > > > >
> > > > > colc If(ROC(C ,65 ,% ),>,ROC(C ,130 ,% ),1,0)
> > > > >
> > > > > cold If(ROC(C ,130 ,% ),>,ROC(C ,260 ,% ),1,0)
> > > > >
> > > > > cole If(C,>,0.50,1,0)
> > > > >
> > > > > colf Sum(VOLUME,10)/10
> > > > >
> > > > > filter When(colA,=,1) AND When(colB,=,1) AND When(colC,=,1)
> > AND
> > > > When
> > > > > (colD,=,1) AND When(colE,=,1) AND When(colF,>,40000)
> > > >
> > > > The following is the description of one of the Momentum
> Screens
> > > from
> > > > Multexinvestor.com. It contains no fundamental criteria. It
> > comes
> > > up
> > > > w/some very nice looking stocks.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to translate this into MS language to
> make
> > it
> > > > an Exploration? And if so, any chance one of you MS whizzes
> > would
> > > > take a crack at it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> > > > Price Momentum
> > > > SUMMARY
> > > >
> > > > This screen searches for stocks that are on the move. The
> > current
> > > > price must be equal to at least eighty percent of the fifty-
> two
> > > week
> > > > high, and the stocks must have demonstrated patterns of
> gradual
> > > > price acceleration over the past year.
> > > >
> > > > DETAILS
> > > >
> > > > This screen selects stocks that are exhibiting strong share
> > price
> > > > trends. It doesn't contain any variables relating to company
> > > > fundamentals (i.e. trends in sales and profits).
Nevertheless,
> > it's
> > > > highly unlikely that any stock could meet all of the tests
> > > presented
> > > > here unless the investment community as a whole has broadly
> > > > favorable expectations about the company's fundamental
> business
> > > > prospects.
> > > >
> > > > 1) {Price}>.8*{PriceH}
> > > >
> > > > Line 1 starts with a simple test that quickly weeds out
deeply
> > > > depressed equities by requiring that the shares now be priced
> no
> > > > lower than 20% below their 52-week highs. Shares that are far
> > below
> > > > their recent peaks can, for brief periods of time, show
strong
> > > > percentage price gains. But all too often, that sort of
> strength
> > > > reflects the poor base upon which comparisons are calculated,
> as
> > > > opposed to bona fide fundamental bullishness.
> > > >
> > > > 2) {Pr4W%Chg}>{Pr52W%Chg}.AND.{Pr4W%Chg}>0
> > > >
> > > > Line 2 points us toward stocks that have recently caught Wall
> > > > Street's eye in a very favorable way. We want issues whose
> > prices
> > > > have risen in the past four weeks and have risen more in
those
> > four
> > > > weeks than they did in all of the past fifty two weeks.
> > > >
> > > > 3) {Pr13W%Chg}>{Pr26W%Chg}.AND.{Pr13W%Chg}>0
> > > >
> > > > Line 3, by seeking stocks that have appreciated in the past
> > > thirteen
> > > > weeks and done so to a greater extent than they had over the
> > prior
> > > > twenty six weeks, is similar to Line 2 except that the latter
> > > > defines a less pronounced share price acceleration. The
> benefit
> > to
> > > > line 3 is its ability to demonstrate that the short-term
price
> > > spike
> > > > we found in Line 2 is not an aberration but a continuation of
> a
> > > > longer, albeit less pronounced, trend of share price
> > acceleration.
> > > >
> > > > 4) {Pr26W%Chg}>{Pr52W%Chg}
> > > >
> > > > Line 4, which requires that the stock have appreciated more
in
> > the
> > > > past twenty-six weeks than it did in the past fifty two
weeks,
> > > > represents an extension of the concept presented in Line 3.
> > Lines
> > > 4,
> > > > 3 and 2 represent progressively increasing degrees of share
> > price
> > > > acceleration.
> > > >
> > > > 5) {Price}>5
> > > >
> > > > Line 5 weeds out lower tier stocks. It eliminates issues that
> > trade
> > > > at or below $5 per share.
> > > >
> > > > 6) {Vol10DAvg}>.04
> > > >
> > > > Line 6, which requires that average daily trading volume over
> > the
> > > > past ten days be greater than 40,000 (.04 million) assures
> that
> > the
> > > > accelerating price trend is accompanied by at least a
> > respectable
> > > > level of volume. This enhances the probability that the
> > improving
> > > > price trend represents a bona fide assessment of company
> > > > fundamentals on the part of a reasonably-sized segment of the
> > > > investment community.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for any help here,
> > > > Harold
> > > >
> > > > x
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|