[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


" Trading Systems and Methods  " - P. Kaufman, iow the reference in TA and
trading systems

I provided the answer to a question you have not even understood yet. Is
Bartjens free gift too ? [Kaufman ain't]

----- Original Message -----
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands


> Obviously has to be a belg............Bartjens goes beyond 8th grades.
>
> The formulas delivered in below mail ARE FOR USE IN METASTOCK !!
> Not in a chatbox.
>
> They are available to you, if you also do have a copy of MetaStocK,
> which I strongly doubt you have.
> =============
>
> For other List members that are -now- truely concerned :
> They make use of the program's StDev(DataArray,Periods) function, that
> you can find in the MSK7x-manual p.264.
> See my other mail send tonight for more detailed info.
>
> And for the Jossarts, Jagows, Stevensons, Manascos and other here not
named
> brown marks among us, think twice before writing + posting
crap..................go by
> the facts, else you just don't stand the chance!!!
> Quality and prime trading + money earning stuff is what we're after here.
Offensive,
> even disgrading words, cannot and will not effect me, since you'll get
easy tackled
> on your silly writings and sending in your own nonsense.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Jossart Alain" <Alain.Jossart@xxxxxxxxx>
> Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Verzonden: vrijdag 27 oktober 2000 13:50
> Onderwerp: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
>
>
> > Probability distribution tables :
> > - +/- 1 std = .3413 x 2 = .6826 = 68.3 %
> > - +/- 1.8 std = .4641 x 2 = .9282 = 92.3 %
> > - +/- 2 std = .4772 x 2 = .9544 = 95.4 %
> > - +/- 3 std = .4987 x 2 = .9974 = 99.7 %
> >
> > and...
> >
> > - 1.64 std = .4495 x 2 = .8990 = 89.9 % of the data
> > or
> > - 1.65 std = .4505 x 2 = .9010 = 90.1 % of the data
> >
> > So the answer to Alberto Torchio's question is : Bollinger (95%) is +/-
2
> > std, while 90 %  is +/- 1.64... std
> >
> > What did you say ? en dus en dan, aah ja, zeker en vast...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> >
> >
> > > The mean=middle=0
> > > and
> > > 100%=da width difference between "+1 stdev"{+100%} and "-1
stdev"{-100%}
> > > thus
> > > 100%{2*1}=2*stdev(da,pds)   {width is then mean + 1*stdev up +1*stdev
> > down}
> > > and
> > > 50%{2*0.5}=1*stdev(da,pds)
> > > then
> > > 90%{2*0.9}=1.8*stdev(da,pds)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> > > Van: "Lionel Issen"
> > > Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Verzonden: dinsdag 24 oktober 2000 4:23
> > > Onderwerp: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> > >
> > >
> > > > I cant find my statistics book, but I think its close to 2 std dev.
> > > > Lionel Issen
> > > > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Alberto Torchio" <atorchio@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: "Realtraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:27 AM
> > > > Subject: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Listmembers,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have been asked a simple question on Bollinger Bands and was
unable
> > to
> > > > > answer...
> > > > > Could anyone tell me the number of standard deviations allowing to
> > contain
> > > > > within the bands 90% of price data?
> > > > >
> > > > > Alberto Torchio
> > > > >  Torino, Italy
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>