[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Obviously has to be a belg............Bartjens goes beyond 8th grades.

The formulas delivered in below mail ARE FOR USE IN METASTOCK !!
Not in a chatbox.

They are available to you, if you also do have a copy of MetaStocK,
which I strongly doubt you have.
=============

For other List members that are -now- truely concerned :
They make use of the program's StDev(DataArray,Periods) function, that
you can find in the MSK7x-manual p.264.
See my other mail send tonight for more detailed info.

And for the Jossarts, Jagows, Stevensons, Manascos and other here not named
brown marks among us, think twice before writing + posting crap..................go by
the facts, else you just don't stand the chance!!!
Quality and prime trading + money earning stuff is what we're after here. Offensive,
even disgrading words, cannot and will not effect me, since you'll get easy tackled
on your silly writings and sending in your own nonsense. 

Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas


----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- 
Van: "Jossart Alain" <Alain.Jossart@xxxxxxxxx>
Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 oktober 2000 13:50
Onderwerp: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands


> Probability distribution tables :
> - +/- 1 std = .3413 x 2 = .6826 = 68.3 %
> - +/- 1.8 std = .4641 x 2 = .9282 = 92.3 %
> - +/- 2 std = .4772 x 2 = .9544 = 95.4 %
> - +/- 3 std = .4987 x 2 = .9974 = 99.7 %
> 
> and...
> 
> - 1.64 std = .4495 x 2 = .8990 = 89.9 % of the data
> or
> - 1.65 std = .4505 x 2 = .9010 = 90.1 % of the data
> 
> So the answer to Alberto Torchio's question is : Bollinger (95%) is +/- 2
> std, while 90 %  is +/- 1.64... std
> 
> What did you say ? en dus en dan, aah ja, zeker en vast...
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> 
> 
> > The mean=middle=0
> > and
> > 100%=da width difference between "+1 stdev"{+100%} and "-1 stdev"{-100%}
> > thus
> > 100%{2*1}=2*stdev(da,pds)   {width is then mean + 1*stdev up +1*stdev
> down}
> > and
> > 50%{2*0.5}=1*stdev(da,pds)
> > then
> > 90%{2*0.9}=1.8*stdev(da,pds)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ton Maas
> > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >
> >
> > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> > Van: "Lionel Issen"
> > Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 24 oktober 2000 4:23
> > Onderwerp: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> >
> >
> > > I cant find my statistics book, but I think its close to 2 std dev.
> > > Lionel Issen
> > > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Alberto Torchio" <atorchio@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Realtraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:27 AM
> > > Subject: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear Listmembers,
> > > >
> > > > I have been asked a simple question on Bollinger Bands and was unable
> to
> > > > answer...
> > > > Could anyone tell me the number of standard deviations allowing to
> contain
> > > > within the bands 90% of price data?
> > > >
> > > > Alberto Torchio
> > > >  Torino, Italy
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>