|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
...Let us be honest: we want those indicators to
"try them out" not because we"know" that they are going to make us
rich.
Herman, spare the lecture, and don't even think of insulting those of us
that have researched this before you had heard of it.
Nobody is proposing that any other improvements should be put
on hold to create these capabilities. I too, would like to see more improvements
for trade control, but unfortunately, it appears that your "general purpose"
enhancements should have the right of way. Surely, you have already created
fixes, work-arounds, scripts, and loops for those enhancements.
I made some suggestions of what I would like to see
without trashing what you would like to see as
enhancements/improvements.
Would you like to change that situation?
Anytime, Baby.
-CS
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
Herman vandenBergen
To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 4:55
PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Poll results for
amibroker - README
Sorry folks, but this poll is pretty SCARY! In fact i am
wetting my pants!I would much prefer to have Tomasz concentrate on
overall versatility andafl enhancements in general, i.e. work on FEATURES
THAT YOU CANNOT FINDANYWHERE ELSE AND THAT WILL BENEFIT EACH AND EVERY
USER.Face it: almost all special indicators can be implemented with a
little bitof work around, some looping, some scripts, or in the extreme
case with aDLL. The DLL-list has considerable expertise and some very
helpful people.If you really think your special indicator will make
you a lot of money thenit is worth your while to learn (remember the
word?) a few new things.Perhaps even pay (YES!) somebody to write a DLL
for you. Also, if a specialindicator is really that important to you then
you could find some otherusers and combine efforts to get the job done,
perhaps even share the costof hiring somebody for a few hours.To
have TJ sweat on that many individual indicators to have some user try
itout and to find that it after all doesn't do the job and to never look
at itagain, is a waste of time. Yes: I have been there and done
it!Let us be honest: we want those indicators to "try them out" not
because we"know" that they are going to make us rich. From the last 200
indicatorsthat you tried, how many have made you rich? Obviously not too
many...It islike looking for the HG: there is NO single million dollar
indicator.Any indicator that has less than 20 (30?) votes should be
ignored. Why?Because in an equivalent amount of time TJ could implement
general purposeAB enhancements that would benefit each and every single
user. Some of theseenhancements (like the recent looping) would allow
probably most of theindicators to be implemented by users
themselves.How many of you have tried the new looping functions? How
would you likesubroutines? Pyramiding? etc. Some of these functions would
benefit everysingle user...OK, I will not vote for any indicator:
I will vote for general purposeenhancement (should have been an item on
the poll?).best regards,Herman-----Original
Message-----From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: April 25, 2003 12:40 AMTo:
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [amibroker] Poll results for
amibrokerThe following amibroker poll is now closed.
Here are thefinal results:POLL QUESTION: In Message 38070,
Tomasz suggested thatwe compose a list of the most desiredindicators
for dynamic parameters so hecan prioritize. PLEASE SELECT YOUR
TOP10 FROM THIS LIST. Note that I combinedseveral similar
indicators/functions tokeep the list at 25 which is the maximumfor a
poll. So a combined entry(BBANDBOT & BBANDTOP, for example)
onlycounts as one indicator for the purposesof this poll :-).
Poll closes in oneweek. Thanks for your input! MarkCHOICES
AND RESULTS- RWIHI & RWILO, 2 votes, 1.41%- SAR, 8 votes,
5.63%- STOCHK & STOCHD, 12 votes, 8.45%- TRIX, 3 votes, 2.11%-
ULTIMATE, 2 votes, 1.41%- WILDERS, 3 votes, 2.11%- HOLD, 2 votes,
1.41%- LINEARREG, LINREGSLOPE, TSF, 16 votes, 11.27%- STDERR &
STDEV , 11 votes, 7.75%- ADX, 12 votes, 8.45%- ATR, 7 votes,
4.93%- BBANDBOT & BBANDTOP, 9 votes, 6.34%- CHAIKIN, 3 votes,
2.11%- MACD & SIGNAL, 10 votes, 7.04%- MDI & PDI, 10 votes,
7.04%- MFI, 4 votes, 2.82%- OSCP, 3 votes, 2.11%- OSCV, 1 votes,
0.70%- RSI & CCI, 10 votes, 7.04%- RMI, 1 votes, 0.70%- ROC,
12 votes, 8.45%- RWI, 1 votes, 0.70%For more information
about this group, please visit<A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibrokerFor
help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit<A
href="">http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/Send
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Web page: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check
group FAQ at:<A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.htmlYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/Send
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check
group FAQ at: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|