|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Are the CME records by session? Whereas the Global Server is midnight to
midnight unless you add up the ticks for those portions of the session that
overlap the dates?
bobr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hango Winspy" <hwinva@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jdo1@xxxxxxxxx>; <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: Tick Reliability
> I have TS4 (started on ver 3) with BMI cable data subscription for 7 plus
> years. My data collection is almost perfect as follows:
>
> My server CME # of ticks Error
> Date collection records missed Rate
>
> 7/22 140,495 140,552 57 .041%
> 7/23 145,354 145,447 93 .064%
> 7/24 151,766 151,992 226 .149%
> 7/25 137,392 137,523 131 .095%
> 7/26 97,290 97,318 28 .029%
>
> Besides Wednesday, I missed only less than one tenth of one percent.
>
> Hango
>
>
> >From: "jdfo" <jdo1@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "Omega List" <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Tick Reliability
> >Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 09:00:40 -0400
> >
> >I use a cable modem, TradeStation 2000i and e-signal. This past week, I
> >received the following ticks on the E-mini, Sept contract:
> >
> > Mon 7/22 139,304
> > Tue 7/23 141,241
> > Wed 7/24 149,970
> > Thu 7/25 136,459
> > Fri 7/26 91,308
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone would care to compare their results to
> >determine the reliability of cable modems and e-signal?
> > I know that retrieving this same data from Omega's HistoryBank.com
> >results in an 40 to 50% error rate; HistoryBank loses almost one-half of
> >the ticks, making this resource totally useless.
> > Thanks in advance for any replies.
> >
> > John O
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|