|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Mark,
Loud and clear!
A system/strategy is always the ultimate test of an indicator, you took the
challenge and produced a system that makes a nice profit.
Unlike those vendors who just present a nice indicator that looks great with
hindsight.
It was/is just a little unclear where you were going with this (and indeed
we would all love to have a good universal MA, guilty as charged of greed).
I love the cynical/spicy language that is often part of this list and will
not complain when it is directed to me.
Thanks
Robert
ps. Anybody who knows what jurik's JMA-2 is doing (never seems to gets
finished...).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:17 PM
Subject: Re[2]: MB's AAMA vs OddBall, any comments?
> Hello Robert,
>
> RL> For two reasons I did not do much testing with it.
> RL> One reason being lack of time but the other reason is that I don't
> RL> know where this will lead.
> RL> What are Mark's intentions with this AAMA?
>
> i asked those who had the time and wanted to of own free will to
> simply see how the aama stacked up against other popular versions.
> from that response i made the last release #3 which should be the kill
> all ama. if not i need to go back to work. i am only concentrating on
> securing the truth about how good it is right now. i have not thought
> beyond that - because it is no use if it does not perform.
>
> RL> Is it for demo only? for co-testing? for sale?
>
> it is a demo only at this stage, i would sell the source for 100,000
> so yea i guess it's for sale if you want it. call br 549 to place
> order.
>
> RL> What to do with yet an other black box?
>
> nothing - be quit and go away if you care not to help.
>
> RL> My guess is that MB just wanted some people to co-test the value
> RL> of this AAMA (which if fine by itself).
>
> good then shut your flap. i now regret making a system out of it. i
> should have just left it a pretty indicator so it could obtain cult
> status someday when i run ads in magazines and talk of star warzie
> math code. and to those who would not trust anything blackbox - if i
> cracked it open you would not know what you were looking at anyway.
> that's about as stupid as saying i will not fly in any air craft
> unless i personally build the engine. bullcrap. it's greed - pure and
> simple go make your own. but if your money motivated you don't have to
> make your own shovels to become a millionaire digging ditches. if you
> want to though thats your prerogative.
>
> RL> The code is well protected and also limited by date/password.
> RL> Hence anything I would do with it would be a waste of time since
> RL> it would stop working the next month.
>
> you have my opinion by now.
>
> RL> While I would gladly run it with other type's of MA's for a
> RL> testspin, I know other people already did this.
> RL> Just some thoughts,
> RL> Robert
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mark mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
|